Literature DB >> 11571065

A comparison of different methods for estimating the prevalence of problematic drug misuse in Great Britain.

M Frischer1, M Hickman, L Kraus, F Mariani, L Wiessing.   

Abstract

AIMS: The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) has produced methodological guidelines for national drug prevalence estimation. This paper pilots the methods to estimate prevalence for Great Britain and provides a commentary on the methods and resulting estimates.
DESIGN: Three types of methodology were used to estimate prevalence: (a) the multiple indicator (MI) method, (b) multipliers applied to (i) drug-treatment records (ii) HIV estimates and (iii) mortality statistics and (c) the British/Scottish Crime Surveys.
SETTING: England, Scotland and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Aggregated data on people recorded on databases and respondents in household surveys. MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence estimates of different forms of problematic drug use.
FINDINGS: The estimates are 161,133 (range: 120,850-241,700) for people at risk of mortality due to drug overdose; 161,000-169,000 for people who have ever injected drugs; 202,000 (range: 162,000-244,000) problem opiate users and 268,000 problem drug users (all types).
CONCLUSIONS: The multiple indicator method offers a comprehensive approach to estimating the prevalence of problematic drug use in the United Kingdom. Simple multiplier methods and household surveys also provide a range of estimates corresponding to different types of drug use in the United Kingdom. The current study suggests that previous national estimates of 100,000-200,000 were conservative. The new estimate of 161,000-266,000 should enable a more focused response. For further development of this method, reliable and timely estimates of anchor points are required for specific geographical areas such as cities or Drug Action Teams (DAT), as well as routine aggregation of drug indicators for these areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11571065     DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.9610146510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  17 in total

1.  Estimating the prevalence of injection drug users in the U.S. and in large U.S. metropolitan areas from 1992 to 2002.

Authors:  Joanne E Brady; Samuel R Friedman; Hannah L F Cooper; Peter L Flom; Barbara Tempalski; Karla Gostnell
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Estimating the prevalence of injection drug use among black and white adults in large U.S. metropolitan areas over time (1992--2002): estimation methods and prevalence trends.

Authors:  Hannah L F Cooper; Joanne E Brady; Samuel R Friedman; Barbara Tempalski; Karla Gostnell; Peter L Flom
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 3.  Variations in rates of comorbid substance use in psychosis between mental health settings and geographical areas in the UK. A systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Carrà; Sonia Johnson
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 4.  Opioid dependence.

Authors:  Jacinta O'Shea; Fergus Law; Jan Melichar
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-07-24

Review 5.  Opioid dependence.

Authors:  K Thyarappa Praveen; Fergus Law; Jacinta O'Shea; Jan Melichar
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-09-20

6.  Substance misuse and psychiatric illness: prospective observational study using the general practice research database.

Authors:  Martin Frisher; Ilana Crome; John Macleod; David Millson; Peter Croft
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Problem drug use, drug misuse and deliberate self-harm: trends and patient characteristics, with a focus on young people, Oxford, 1993-2006.

Authors:  Camilla M Haw; Keith Hawton
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  An HIV prevalence-based model for estimating urban risk populations of injection drug users and men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Spencer Lieb; Samuel R Friedman; Mary Beth Zeni; Dale D Chitwood; Thomas M Liberti; Gary J Gates; Lisa R Metsch; Lorene M Maddox; Tamara Kuper
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.671

9.  Estimating numbers of injecting drug users in metropolitan areas for structural analyses of community vulnerability and for assessing relative degrees of service provision for injecting drug users.

Authors:  Samuel R Friedman; Barbara Tempalski; Hannah Cooper; Theresa Perlis; Marie Keem; Risa Friedman; Peter L Flom
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.671

10.  Trends in the population prevalence of people who inject drugs in US metropolitan areas 1992-2007.

Authors:  Barbara Tempalski; Enrique R Pouget; Charles M Cleland; Joanne E Brady; Hannah L F Cooper; H Irene Hall; Amy Lansky; Brooke S West; Samuel R Friedman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.