Literature DB >> 11570944

Obese patients' perceptions of treatment outcomes and the factors that influence them.

G D Foster1, T A Wadden, S Phelan, D B Sarwer, R S Sanderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite considerable professional consensus that modest weight losses of 5% to 10% are successful for reducing the comorbid conditions associated with obesity, obese patients often desire weight losses 2 to 3 times greater than this. Examining ways to reduce the disparities between treatment expectations and subsequent outcomes, this study evaluated the role of physical characteristics, treatment setting, and mood in patients' evaluations of treatment outcomes.
METHODS: This study was conducted in a university outpatient weight loss clinic with a sample of 397 obese individuals seeking weight loss by a variety of modalities. Before treatment, participants' heights and weights were measured, and the Beck Depression Inventory and the Goals and Relative Weight Questionnaire were administered.
RESULTS: Outcome evaluations ranged from 64.4 +/- 11.1 kg (mean +/- SD) for dream weight to 90.1 +/- 19.1 kg for disappointed weight. Initial body weight was the strongest predictor of disappointed, acceptable, and happy weights (beta =.90,.76, and.57, respectively). Sex (beta = -.37) and height (beta =.37) were the strongest determinants of dream weight. Heavier participants chose higher absolute weights, but the weight loss required to reach each of the outcomes was greater for heavier than for lighter patients.
CONCLUSIONS: These data signal a therapeutic dilemma in which the amount of weight loss produced by the best behavioral and/or pharmacologic treatments is viewed as even less than disappointing. Patients with the highest pretreatment weights are likely to have the most unrealistic expectations for success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11570944     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.17.2133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  42 in total

Review 1.  Body weight regulation and obesity.

Authors:  Lee M Kaplan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Weight management by phone conference call: a comparison with a traditional face-to-face clinic. Rationale and design for a randomized equivalence trial.

Authors:  Kate Lambourne; Richard A Washburn; Cheryl Gibson; Debra K Sullivan; Jeannine Goetz; Robert Lee; Bryan K Smith; Matthew S Mayo; Joseph E Donnelly
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Weight-related perceptions among patients and physicians: how well do physicians judge patients' motivation to lose weight?

Authors:  Christie A Befort; K Allen Greiner; Sandra Hall; Kim M Pulvers; Nicole L Nollen; Andrea Charbonneau; Harsohena Kaur; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Assessing the value of weight loss among primary care patients.

Authors:  Christina C Wee; Mary B Hamel; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Health-related quality of life following vertical banded gastroplasty.

Authors:  Gerbrand C M van Hout; Frederiek A M Fortuin; Aline J M Pelle; Marieke E Blokland-Koomen; Guus L van Heck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Impact of Weight-Related Discrimination, Body Dissatisfaction and Self-Stigma on the Desire to Weigh Less.

Authors:  Franziska Jung; Jenny Spahlholz; Anja Hilbert; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Claudia Luck-Sikorski
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.942

7.  Contribution of behavior intervention components to 24-month weight loss.

Authors:  Jessica L Unick; John M Jakicic; Bess H Marcus
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  A virtual reality intervention (Second Life) to improve weight maintenance: Rationale and design for an 18-month randomized trial.

Authors:  D K Sullivan; J R Goetz; C A Gibson; M S Mayo; R A Washburn; Y Lee; L T Ptomey; J E Donnelly
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Health-related quality of life and weight loss practices among overweight and obese US adults, 2003 behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

Authors:  Connie L Bish; Heidi Michels Blanck; L Michele Maynard; Mary K Serdula; Nancy J Thompson; Laura Kettel Khan
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-05-14

10.  Development and validation of the Treatment Related Impact Measure of Weight (TRIM-Weight).

Authors:  Meryl Brod; Mette Hammer; Nana Kragh; Suzanne Lessard; Donald M Bushnell
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.