Literature DB >> 11569525

Implications and consequences of enzyme induction on preclinical and clinical drug development.

P D Worboys1, D J Carlile.   

Abstract

1. Enzyme induction has traditionally been studied during drug development to assess the potential of drug entities to interact with concomitant medications and alter their pharmacological effects, and clearly it is an unwanted phenomenon. However, another hurdle caused by induction occurs during preclinical development via the attainment of safety data, obtained by dosing high quantities of compound to species used in toxicology assessment. This review considers the techniques that can now be utilized in drug discovery, their relevance, the pharmacokinetic aspects of this phenomenon, and it discusses the consequences and implications of induction during preclinical and clinical development. 2. It is becoming increasingly routine to employ hepatocyte cultures and novel techniques such as quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR to identify enzyme inducers in vitro. The major challenge is to utilize these in vitro data to predict the consequences of induction in vivo. From an understanding of pharmacokinetic principles and low clinical doses relative to preclinical studies, there is limited potential for induction by a development candidate to significantly alter the pharmacological efficacy of a co-administered drug. 3. The most comprehensive approach when considering induction involves integrating quantitative in vitro data, information on the pharmacokinetic behaviour of the compound and the PK/PD) relationship in order to predict its consequences. The generation of this holistic strategy would enable more detailed and informed decision-making about both the suitability of molecules for development and the development strategy itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11569525     DOI: 10.1080/00498250110054623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenobiotica        ISSN: 0049-8254            Impact factor:   1.908


  4 in total

Review 1.  Use of in vivo animal models to assess pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.

Authors:  Cuyue Tang; Thomayant Prueksaritanont
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Assessment of temporal biochemical and gene transcription changes in rat liver cytochrome P450: utility of real-time quantitative RT-PCR.

Authors:  Federico M Goodsaid; Jairam R Palamanda; Diana Montgomery; George Mandakas; Chunyan Gu; Zhiling Li; Xiaoli You; Laura Norton; Roger Smith; Inhou Chu; Tony Soares; Kevin Alton; Narendra S Kishnani; I Y Rosenblum
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Successful drug development despite adverse preclinical findings part 1: processes to address issues and most important findings.

Authors:  Robert A Ettlin; Junji Kuroda; Stephanie Plassmann; David E Prentice
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.628

4.  No evidence for interactions of dimethylfumarate (DMF) and its main metabolite monomethylfumarate (MMF) with human cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) drug transporter.

Authors:  Jordi Aubets; Josep-Maria Jansat; Miquel Salva; Vicky M Birks; Richard J Cole; Jenny Lewis; Annabell Pitcher; Michael Hall
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2019-12-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.