BACKGROUND: Stockings for thrombosis prophylaxis (MTS) are generally advised for all immobilized patients by the German Societies of Surgery, Orthopedics, and Phlebology. In critical care patients, the indication is unclear and many questions are left unanswered, especially if combined with heparins for prophylaxis of thromboembolism. We evaluated the customary use of MTS in critical care patients. METHODS: A multiple choice questionnaire was sent to the nursing staff of 324 randomly selected German non-surgical ICUs. The answers of 144 units (44.4%) could be evaluated, 15 of which were special neurology, 88 special internal medicine, 41 mixed. RESULTS: Each 8th ICU principally avoids MTS, each 19th ICU principally provides all patients with MTS. Of those who use special indications, the degree of immobilisation plays an indecisive role with 50% for and 50% against MTS. In particular, coma serves as a contraindication. Effective anticoagulation excludes the need for MTS in half of the ICUs. Polyneuropathies and dysesthesias are the far most noticed arguments against MTS. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be an uncertainty about the indication of MTS for non-surgical critical ill patients. With respect to available guidelines, a decision in principle for MTS should be made. However, in the individual patient with relative contraindications and progressively effective anticoagulation, MTS may be dispended relatively liberally.
BACKGROUND: Stockings for thrombosis prophylaxis (MTS) are generally advised for all immobilized patients by the German Societies of Surgery, Orthopedics, and Phlebology. In critical care patients, the indication is unclear and many questions are left unanswered, especially if combined with heparins for prophylaxis of thromboembolism. We evaluated the customary use of MTS in critical care patients. METHODS: A multiple choice questionnaire was sent to the nursing staff of 324 randomly selected German non-surgical ICUs. The answers of 144 units (44.4%) could be evaluated, 15 of which were special neurology, 88 special internal medicine, 41 mixed. RESULTS: Each 8th ICU principally avoids MTS, each 19th ICU principally provides all patients with MTS. Of those who use special indications, the degree of immobilisation plays an indecisive role with 50% for and 50% against MTS. In particular, coma serves as a contraindication. Effective anticoagulation excludes the need for MTS in half of the ICUs. Polyneuropathies and dysesthesias are the far most noticed arguments against MTS. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be an uncertainty about the indication of MTS for non-surgical critical ill patients. With respect to available guidelines, a decision in principle for MTS should be made. However, in the individual patient with relative contraindications and progressively effective anticoagulation, MTS may be dispended relatively liberally.
Authors: Yaseen M Arabi; Sami Alsolamy; Abdulaziz Al-Dawood; Awad Al-Omari; Fahad Al-Hameed; Karen E A Burns; Mohammed Almaani; Hani Lababidi; Ali Al Bshabshe; Sangeeta Mehta; Abdulsalam M Al-Aithan; Yasser Mandourah; Ghaleb Almekhlafi; Simon Finfer; Sheryl Ann I Abdukahil; Lara Y Afesh; Maamoun Dbsawy; Musharaf Sadat Journal: Trials Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 2.279