Literature DB >> 11568747

Energy density and numbers of treatment affect response of keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars to the 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser.

W Manuskiatti1, R E Fitzpatrick, M P Goldman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser (PDL) has proven to be the treatment of choice for certain keloids and hypertrophic scars, but the precise fluence, numbers of treatment, and treatment interval remain anecdotal.
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine whether the therapeutic outcome of the PDL varies with the energy density (fluence) of the laser pulses and numbers of treatment.
METHOD: Ten previously untreated, erythematous, keloidal or hypertrophic median sternotomy scars of 10 patients were divided into 4 segments and were randomly treated with a 585-nm PDL at a fluence of 3, 5, and 7 J/cm(2) to 3 of 4 segments every 4 weeks for a total of 6 treatment sessions. One segment of each patient's scars was untreated and served as a control. Clinical improvement including scar height, erythema, and pliability was evaluated before treatment and every 8 weeks for a total period of 32 weeks. Self-assessment was also determined by patients on a 25% increment of improvement scale comparing week 0 and week 32.
RESULTS: A significant improvement in scar height, erythema, and pliability was noted in all laser-treated scar areas. There was no significant difference in treatment outcome versus the fluence of the laser (3, 5, and 7 J/cm(2)), although there was a trend for lower fluences to show more improvement. Objective clinical improvement was seen as early as week 16, after more than two treatments were given. Multiple treatments (>2) appeared to provide a greater percentage of scar resolution.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical improvement of scars after PDL treatment demonstrates no statistically significant fluence dependence in this study, but a trend toward better response with lower fluences is seen. In addition, multiple treatment sessions are suggested for achieving greater response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11568747     DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2001.116580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of short- and long-pulse durations when using a 585-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of new surgical scars.

Authors:  Keyvan Nouri; Mohamed L Elsaie; Voraphol Vejjabhinanta; Mark Stevens; Shalu S Patel; Caroline Caperton; George Elgart
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  [Treatment of keloids at the ear].

Authors:  Fabienne Oettgen; Frank Haubner
Journal:  Dermatologie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-09

Review 3.  Laser therapy for treating hypertrophic and keloid scars.

Authors:  Rafael Leszczynski; Carolina Ap da Silva; Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto; Uliana Kuczynski; Edina Mk da Silva
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-26

Review 4.  Biology and principles of scar management and burn reconstruction.

Authors:  Edward E Tredget; Benjamin Levi; Matthias B Donelan
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Laser scar management technique.

Authors:  Takafumi Ohshiro; Toshio Ohshiro; Katsumi Sasaki
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2013-12-30

6.  Surgical scar revision: an overview.

Authors:  Shilpa Garg; Naveen Dahiya; Somesh Gupta
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-01

Review 7.  The role of lasers and intense pulsed light technology in dermatology.

Authors:  Zain Husain; Tina S Alster
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2016-02-04

8.  Effect of UVA1 on hypertrophic scarring in the rabbit ear model.

Authors:  Tong Zhang; Zhiming Shen; Jie Zheng; Rui Jiang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.840

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.