Literature DB >> 11568676

Recovery from vestibular ototoxicity.

F O Black1, C Gianna-Poulin, S C Pesznecker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine whether subjects with documented vestibular ototoxicity recover vestibular function and, if so, investigate the recovery dynamics. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective and retrospective reviews and repeated measures.
SETTING: Clinical research and technology center.
SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight subjects who received vestibulotoxic medications were followed for at least 12 months after initial treatment. CONTROLS: Our subject sample was compared with a published database of normal individuals.
INTERVENTIONS: All 28 subjects received systemically administered medications known to be ototoxic. The subjects' treating physicians controlled medication, dosage, and administration schedules. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tests of horizontal canal vestibulo-ocular function were performed. Subjects' auditory and vestibular symptoms were recorded.
RESULTS: Eleven subjects (39%) showed changes in horizontal canal vestibulo-ocular gain constant (GC) and/or time constant (TC) consistent with vestibular ototoxicity. When tested 1 year after ototoxic drug administration, eight of the nine subjects who experienced ototoxic decrease in GC showed a recovery of GC to normal limits. Only one of the eight subjects who experienced ototoxic decrease in TC showed recovery of TC to within normal limits. Ototoxicity onset and recovery were independent of baseline vestibular function, and ototoxicity onset did not correlate with cumulative dose of ototoxic medication. There was no relationship between subjective symptoms and ototoxicity onset.
CONCLUSIONS: Recovery of GC after vestibular ototoxicity is more commonly observed than recovery of TC. Because ototoxic changes developed and continued in an unpredictable time and manner in relation to ototoxic drug administration, we propose that once ototoxic changes in vestibulo-ocular reflex are detected, ototoxic medications should be discontinued as soon as possible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11568676     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200109000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  Co-modulation of stimulus rate and current from elevated baselines expands head motion encoding range of the vestibular prosthesis.

Authors:  Natan S Davidovics; Gene Y Fridman; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Labyrinthine lesions and motion sickness susceptibility.

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  [The "Muenster classification" of high frequency hearing loss following cisplatin chemotherapy].

Authors:  C-M Schmidt; E Bartholomäus; D Deuster; A Heinecke; A G Dinnesen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Effects of biphasic current pulse frequency, amplitude, duration, and interphase gap on eye movement responses to prosthetic electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve.

Authors:  Natan S Davidovics; Gene Y Fridman; Bryce Chiang; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Clinical Considerations for Routine Auditory and Vestibular Monitoring in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Gayla L Poling; Ronald C Rubenstein; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Timothy E Hullar; David M Baguley; Holly L Burrows; Jennifer A Chisholm; Amy Custer; Laura Dreisbach Hawe; Lisa L Hunter; Theodore K Marras; Candice E Ortiz; Lucretia Petersen; Peter S Steyger; Kevin Winthrop; Erika M Zettner; Khaya Clark; Michelle Hungerford; Jay J Vachhani; Carmen C Brewer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  Multichannel vestibular prosthesis employing modulation of pulse rate and current with alignment precompensation elicits improved VOR performance in monkeys.

Authors:  Natan S Davidovics; Mehdi A Rahman; Chenkai Dai; JoongHo Ahn; Gene Y Fridman; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-26

7.  Clinical Predictors of Streptomycin-Vestibulotoxicity.

Authors:  Miraj Ahmed; Anupam Mishra; Kamal Kumar Sawlani; Veerendra Verma; Rajiv Garg; Hitendra Prakash Singh; Sunil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-19

Review 8.  Applying U.S. national guidelines for ototoxicity monitoring in adult patients: perspectives on patient populations, service gaps, barriers and solutions.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Gayla L Poling; Angela C Garinis; Candice E Ortiz; Jennifer Hopper; Keri O'Connell Bennett; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 9.  Rare Disorders of the Vestibular Labyrinth: of Zebras, Chameleons and Wolves in Sheep's Clothing.

Authors:  Julia Dlugaiczyk
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.057

Review 10.  A meta-analysis and systematic review of the prevalence of mitochondrially encoded 12S RNA in the general population: Is there a role for screening neonates requiring aminoglycosides?

Authors:  Titus S Ibekwe; Sanjiv K Bhimrao; Brian D Westerberg; Frederick K Kozak
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.