Literature DB >> 11568670

Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation.

C Allen1, T P Nikolopoulos, D Dyar, G M O'Donoghue.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of the Speech Intelligibility Rating scale to monitor the speech intelligibility of deaf children who have received cochlear implants. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study assessing the speech intelligibility of deaf children with cochlear implants by local and cochlear implant program speech and language therapists.
SETTING: Pediatric tertiary referral center for cochlear implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four children were each rated by two speech and language therapists, one working with the child locally and the other working with the child at the cochlear implant program. All children were between 1.2 and 10.9 years of age at the time of implantation (median, 4.0 years). The follow-up intervals ranged from before implantation to 9 years after implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, and kappa statistics were used to assess the interobserver reliability of the Speech Intelligibility Rating scale.
RESULTS: Spearman rank correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient were 0.82 with high statistical significance (p < 0.00001). Kappa statistical analysis revealed a moderate to substantial agreement between the ratings. This agreement also reached a high statistical significance (overall kappa = 0.53, p < 0.000001). The Speech Intelligibility Rating scale was found to be able to discriminate speech intelligibility among subjects, and the ratings covaried with high consistency.
CONCLUSION: The study found a high rate of agreement between observers when they used the Speech Intelligibility Rating scale to assess the speech intelligibility of deaf children after cochlear implantation. Because the scale presents information in a format that is understood by parents, local professionals, and health care purchasers, it will be useful to provide them with accessible information on speech intelligibility outcomes of deaf children who have received cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11568670     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200109000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  33 in total

1.  Outcome of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear malformations.

Authors:  Jesper Bille; Vibeke Fink-Jensen; Therese Ovesen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Clinical audit of outcomes in Cochlear Implantation an Indian experience.

Authors:  Mohan Kameswaran; S Raghunandhan; Kiran Natarajan; Naveed Basheeth
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-01

3.  Magnet migration in a cochlear implantee - a serendipitous diagnosis.

Authors:  S Raghunandhan; P Vijaya Krishnan; Srividya Prashanth; Sathiya Murali; Mohan Kameswaran
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-09-24

4.  The outcome of cochlear implantation among children with genetic syndromes.

Authors:  Farid Alzhrani; Rayan Alhussini; Rawan Hudeib; Tuqa Alkaff; Tahera Islam; Abdulrahman Alsanosi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Auditory Performance in Early Implanted Children with Cochleovestibular Malformation and Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Iylia Ajmal Othman; Asma Abdullah; Goh Bee See; Cila Umat; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

6.  Cochlear implantation in incomplete partition type I.

Authors:  Ali Eftekharian; Kourosh Eftekharian; Nooshin Mokari; Maryam Fazel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Speech and language development after cochlear implantation in children with bony labyrinth malformations: long-term results.

Authors:  Tolgahan Catli; Burcu Uckan; Levent Olgun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Functional Outcomes in Cochleostomy and Round Window Insertion Technique: Difference or No Difference?

Authors:  Meenakashi Rajput; Ajith Nilakantan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-07-08

9.  Comparison of Clinician Versus Parental Perspectives of Outcomes in Cochlear Implantees: A South Indian Experience.

Authors:  Nithya Venkataramani; R Anbuchezhian; S Sudha Maheswari; Senthil Vadivu Arumugam; S Raghu Nandhan; Mohan Kameswaran
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-07-13

10.  Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Life Quality in children and adolescents in Norwegian Sign Language.

Authors:  Chris Margaret Aanondsen; Thomas Jozefiak; Kerstin Heiling; Stian Lydersen; Tormod Rimehaug
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.