Literature DB >> 11568482

Incipient sexual isolation in the nasuta-albomicans complex of Drosophila: mating preference in male-, female- and multiple-choice mating experiments.

M T Tanuja1, N B Ramachandra, H A Ranganath.   

Abstract

Interracial divergence is an important facet of speciation. The nasuta-albomicans complex of Drosophila with sixteen morphologically identical, karyotypically different but cross-fertile races is an excellent system to study a few dimensions of raciation. Drosophila nasuta nasuta, Drosophila nasuta albomicans, Cytorace 1, Cytorace 2, Cytorace 3 and Cytorace 4 of this subgroup have been subjected to male-, female- and multiple-choice mating experiments. Out of 8456 crosses conducted, 7185 had successful matings. The overall impression is that mating is far from random amongst these six closely related races of the nasuta-albomicans complex. The males of D. n. albomicans, Cytorace 1 and Cytorace 4 in male-choice, the females of Cytorace 1 and Cytorace 2 in female-choice, and the males and females of D. n. nasuta, D. n. albomicans, Cytorace 1 and Cytorace 4 against the males and females of Cytorace 2 in multiple-choice experiments, had significantly more homogamic matings than expected. Thus in this study of evolutionary experimentation on raciation under laboratory conditions, we have documented the initiation of preference for conspecific matings among closely related and independently evolving members of the nasuta-albomicans complex of Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11568482     DOI: 10.1007/bf02703746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  14 in total

1.  Population Genetics of DROSOPHILA NASUTA NASUTA, DROSOPHILA NASUTA ALBOMICANA and Their Hybrids. I. Karyotypic Mosaicism in the Hybrid Populations.

Authors:  M R Rajasekarasetty; L S Gowda; N B Krishnamurthy; H A Ranganath
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  No character displacement for reproductive isolation between Drosophila bipectinata and Drosophila malerkotliana.

Authors:  B N Singh; S Chatterjee
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.166

3.  COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR AND CONTROL OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION IN DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS.

Authors:  Robert A Krebs; Therese A Markow
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  ASYMMETRICAL MATING PATTERNS BETWEEN GEOGRAPHIC STRAINS OF DROSOPHILA MERCATORUM: A TEST OF THE KANESHIRO HYPOTHESIS.

Authors:  H Roberta Koepfer; Eugene J Fenster
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  ETHOLOGICAL ISOLATION AND PHYLOGENY IN THE PLANITIBIA SUBGROUP OF HAWAIIAN DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Kenneth Y Kaneshiro
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Continual change in mate preferences.

Authors:  Y Iwasa; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sexual isolation among isofemale strains within a population of Drosophila immigrans.

Authors:  L Ehrman; P A Parsons
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Sexual isolation in Drosophila. III. Estimating isolation using male-choice experiments.

Authors:  I Marín
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1997-10-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 9.  Population and behaviour genetics of Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  B N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Does evolution reduce the body size? A study of the four members of newly evolved nasuta-albomicans complex of Drosophila.

Authors:  B P Harini; N B Ramachandra
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.082

View more
  3 in total

1.  Introgressive hybridization and evolution of a novel protein phenotype: glue protein profiles in the nasuta-albomicans complex of Drosophila.

Authors:  S Aruna; H A Ranganath
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Hybridization, transgressive segregation and evolution of new genetic systems in Drosophila.

Authors:  H A Ranganath; S Aruna
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Evidence for no sexual isolation between Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta.

Authors:  Yong-Kyu Kim; Dennis R Phillips; Yun Tao
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.