Literature DB >> 11567552

Implant infections: a haven for opportunistic bacteria.

J M Schierholz1, J Beuth.   

Abstract

The insertion of implants and medical devices has emerged as a common and often life-saving procedure. A current estimate of the rate of total hip replacement in the world is approximately one million a year, and knee replacements more than 250000. More than 30% of hospitalized patients have one or more vascular catheters in place. More than 10% of hospitalized patients have an indwelling urinary catheter. Some patients require multiple joint replacements. In the United States, approximately 2 million nosocomial infections cost nearly $11 billion annually. Exposure to invasive medical devices is one of the most important risk factors.(1)Devices predispose to infection by damaging or invading epithelial or mucosal barriers and by supporting growth of micro-organisms, thus serving as reservoirs. Invasive medical devices impair host defence mechanisms and, when contaminated, can result in resistant chronic infection or tissue necrosis, the major objections to extended use of implant devices. Implant devices today account for approximately 45% of all nosocomial infections.(2)Implant infections are extremely resistant to antibiotics and host defences and frequently persist until the implant is removed, which is the standard therapy. Tissue damage caused by surgery and foreign body implantation further increases the susceptibility to infections, activates host defences and stimulates the generation of inflammatory mediators; these are enhanced by bacterial activity and toxins.(3)The ability of bacteria such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, which are otherwise virtually avirulent, to escape from host defences and antibiotic therapy, has led to the development of alternative methods of control such as infection-resistant materials acting as antimicrobial drug-delivery systems. By these methods, there is a sustained delivery of antimicrobial drugs into the local micro-environment of implants, which avoids systemic side-effects and exceeds usual systemic concentrations by several orders of magnitude. Bioengineering of hybrid implant materials in order to achieve optimal performance and to prevent inflammatory reactions and interface cellular disorganization is a field undergoing rapid development. Hybrid materials that slowly deliver antimicrobial drugs may reduce implant infections in the future. Copyright 2001 The Hospital Infection Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11567552     DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  77 in total

Review 1.  [Special aspects of implant-associated infection in orthopedic surgery. From the pathophysiology to custom-tailored prevention strategies].

Authors:  J M Schierholz; C Morsczeck; N Brenner; D P König; N Yücel; M Korenkov; E Neugebauer; A F E Rump; G Waalenkamp; J Beuth; G Pulverer; S Arens
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Targeted delivery of vancomycin to Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms using a fibrinogen-derived peptide.

Authors:  Christopher M Hofmann; James M Anderson; Roger E Marchant
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Ultrasonically controlled release of ciprofloxacin from self-assembled coatings on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm prevention.

Authors:  P Norris; M Noble; I Francolini; A M Vinogradov; P S Stewart; B D Ratner; J W Costerton; P Stoodley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Effective prevention of microbial biofilm formation on medical devices by low-energy surface acoustic waves.

Authors:  Zadik Hazan; Jona Zumeris; Harold Jacob; Hanan Raskin; Gera Kratysh; Moshe Vishnia; Naama Dror; Tilda Barliya; Mathilda Mandel; Gad Lavie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Antimicrobial hydrogels for the treatment of infection.

Authors:  Ana Salomé Veiga; Joel P Schneider
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 6.  Antibiotics in 3D-printed implants, instruments and materials: benefits, challenges and future directions.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Karthik Tappa; Christen J Boyer; Udayabhanu Jammalamadaka; Kavya Hemmanur; Jeffery A Weisman; Jonathan S Alexander; David K Mills; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J 3D Print Med       Date:  2019-05-31

Review 7.  Emerging technologies for long-term antimicrobial device coatings: advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Erika L Cyphert; Horst A von Recum
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-01-01

8.  Inherent antibacterial activity of a peptide-based beta-hairpin hydrogel.

Authors:  Daphne A Salick; Juliana K Kretsinger; Darrin J Pochan; Joel P Schneider
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  In vitro study on an antibacterial Ti-5Cu alloy for medical application.

Authors:  Zheng Ma; Mei Li; Rui Liu; Ling Ren; Yu Zhang; Haobo Pan; Ying Zhao; Ke Yang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Application of a high throughput Alamar blue biofilm susceptibility assay to Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Robin K Pettit; Christine A Weber; George R Pettit
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.