Literature DB >> 11567544

Surgical approaches for osteoarthritis.

K P Günther1.   

Abstract

Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) often benefit from properly performed surgical procedures. However, the scientific database from studies investigating appropriate timing of surgery, patient morbidity, quality of life before and after the intervention, and cost utility of different procedures is insufficient. In order to allow a fair allocation of resources in future health care systems, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with defined entry criteria, sufficient number of patients, and valid outcome measures should be performed for different surgical approaches. They should especially include control groups with conservative treatment in order to allow an evidence based comparison between different therapeutic approaches. At present, however, optimal management of OA as a dynamic disease process must include a combination of conservative as well as operative treatment modalities. In case of malalignment, instability and intra-articular causes of mechanical dysfunction, correction of these abnormalities and relief of symptoms can be achieved with properly indicated and performed osteotomies. Debridement by arthroscopy and arthotomy probably does not alter the natural history of OA and true clinical outcomes are difficult to determine, but it can provide transient relief of symptoms. Joint replacement has to be considered for refractory pain associated with disability and radiological deterioration. As the pre-operative functional status seems to influence the outcome not only in joint replacement but also in joint-preserving osteotomies, the indication for these procedures might be expanded in the future. Copyright 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11567544     DOI: 10.1053/berh.2001.0178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1521-6942            Impact factor:   4.098


  7 in total

1.  Presurgery osteoarthritis severity over 10 years in 2 Ontario prospective total knee replacement cohorts: a cohort study.

Authors:  Aileen M Davis; Selahadin Ibrahim; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Dorcas E Beaton; Bert M Chesworth; Rajiv Gandhi; Nizar N Mahomed; Anthony V Perruccio; Vaishnav Rajgopal; Rosalind Wong; James P Waddell
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-07-19

2.  Surgeons' expectations of osteotomies around the knee.

Authors:  Thekla Esser; Tim Saier; Christina Valle; Marcus Schmitt-Sody; Matthias J Feucht; Peter M Prodinger; Philipp Minzlaff
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Surgical options for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Philip Kasten; Klaus-Peter Günther; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  The number of stairs into home do not impact discharge disposition and patient reported outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vivek Singh; Alex Tang; Vinay K Aggarwal; Ran Schwarzkopf; Joshua C Rozell
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  All-cause mortality and serious cardiovascular events in people with hip and knee osteoarthritis: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker; Ruth Croxford; Arlene S Bierman; Paula J Harvey; Bheeshma Ravi; Ian Stanaitis; Lorraine L Lipscombe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Device-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the KineSpring in cadaver knees.

Authors:  Michael J McNicholas; Stefan M Gabriel; Anton G Clifford; Evelyne M Hasler
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-01-06

7.  Varus distal femoral osteotomy in young adults with valgus knee.

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Ibrahim G Hasankhani; Mahdi Mazlumi; Mohamad H Ebrahimzadeh
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.