Literature DB >> 11567186

Do high glucose levels have differential effect on FDG uptake in inflammatory and malignant disorders?

H M Zhuang1, A Cortés-Blanco, M Pourdehnad, L E Adam, A J Yamamoto, R Martínez-Lázaro, J H Lee, J C Loman, M D Rossman, A Alavi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The association of hyperglycaemia with reduced fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake by tumour cells is well established. Therefore, it is standard practice that all patients must fast for at least several hours prior to FDG positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, the effect of hyperglycaemia on FDG uptake by inflammatory and infectious lesions is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate this important issue.
METHODS: For in vitro studies human mononuclear cells were isolated from 12 normal volunteers and FDG uptake was determined in medium containing differing concentrations of glucose. FDG uptake by human mesothelioma cells was also measured for comparison. For studies involving patients, 416 FDG PET scans of patients with confirmed malignancy (n=321) or benign lesions (n=95) were reviewed retrospectively. The relationship between serum glucose level and FDG uptake by the lesions was assessed utilizing the standardized uptake value (SUV) technique.
RESULTS: In the in vitro studies, while FDG uptake by mesothelioma cells decreased as glucose concentration increased, there was no differential uptake of FDG uptake by mononuclear cells at glucose concentrations less than 250 mg x dl(-1). In clinical patients, FDG uptake by malignant lesions was slightly, but negatively affected by serum glucose level (r= -0.21, P<0.01) (glucose range 49-187 mg x dl(-1)). In contrast, FDG uptake by inflammatory lesions was positively associated with serum glucose level (r=0.43, P<0.01) (glucose range 54-215 mg x dl(-1)). DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: While the degree of FDG uptake is primarily influenced by the nature of the underlying lesion, serum glucose concentration appears to have a small effect on FDG uptake, which differs between malignant disorders and inflammatory processes. Our data suggest that below a certain level, elevated glucose concentration might not have a negative effect on FDG uptake in inflammatory cells, contrary to that observed in malignant disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11567186     DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200110000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  22 in total

1.  Dose-response relationship in cyclophosphamide-treated B-cell lymphoma xenografts monitored with [18F]FDG PET.

Authors:  Lieselot Brepoels; Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Sigrid Stroobants; Gregor Verhoef; Jan Balzarini; Luc Mortelmans; Felix M Mottaghy
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and velocity in predicting head-and-neck cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Karen P Chu; James D Murphy; Trang H La; Trevor E Krakow; Andrei Iagaru; Edward E Graves; Annie Hsu; Peter G Maxim; Billy Loo; Daniel T Chang; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Diabetes and PET Scans: Only Part of a Bigger Problem.

Authors:  Amit Khithani
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07

4.  FDG PET/CT imaging in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.

Authors:  Olga Kagna; Saher Srour; Eyal Melamed; Daniela Militianu; Zohar Keidar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT with Contrast Enhancement for Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in T1 Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eun Jung Kong; Kyung Ah Chun; Ihn Ho Cho; Soo Jung Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06-15

6.  Quantification of tumour (18) F-FDG uptake: Normalise to blood glucose or scale to liver uptake?

Authors:  Georgia Keramida; Sabina Dizdarevic; Janice Bush; A Michael Peters
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Imaging in Giant Cell Arteritis.

Authors:  Asad Khan; Bhaskar Dasgupta
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 8.  Role of modern imaging techniques for diagnosis of infection in the era of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Sandip Basu; Drew Torigian; Vivek Anand; Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 9.  Neuropathic osteoarthropathy with and without superimposed osteomyelitis in patients with a diabetic foot.

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Victor N Cassar-Pullicino; Alessia Semprini; Laura Tonetti; Nicola Magarelli; Cesare Colosimo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  PET imaging study of brown adipose tissue (BAT) activity in mice devoid of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE).

Authors:  Yu-Shin Ding; Noeen Malik; Sebastian Mendoza; Daniel Tuchman; Carmen Hurtado Del Pozo; Raquel Lopez Diez; Ann-Marie Schmidt
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.