Literature DB >> 11567115

Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?

M Enserink.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11567115     DOI： 10.1126/science.293.5538.2187a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Erik Cobo; Albert Selva-O'Callagham; Josep-Maria Ribera; Francesc Cardellach; Ruth Dominguez; Miquel Vilardell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  CytoJournal joins 'open access' philosophy.

Authors:  Vinod B Shidham; Anthony Cafaro; Barbara F Atkinson
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals.

Authors:  Antoni Margalida; M Àngels Colomer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews.

Authors:  Tirthankar Ghosal; Sandeep Kumar; Prabhat Kumar Bharti; Asif Ekbal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.