Literature DB >> 11566109

Evolution of Ftz protein function in insects.

C R Alonso1, J Maxton-Kuechenmeister, M Akam.   

Abstract

The Drosophila gene fushi tarazu (ftz) encodes a homeodomain-containing transcriptional regulator (Ftz) required at several stages during development. Drosophila melanogaster ftz (Dm-ftz) is first expressed in seven stripes defining alternate parasegments of the embryo--a "pair-rule" segmentation function [1, 2]. It is then expressed in specific neural precursor cells in the central nervous system and finally in the developing hindgut [3]. An Orthopteran ortholog of ftz (Sg-ftz, formally Dax) has been isolated from the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria [4]. The pattern of Sg-ftz expression in Schistocerca embryos suggests that some developmental roles of the ftz gene are likely to be conserved between these two species (e.g., CNS functions) while others may have diverged (e.g., segmentation functions). To test whether the function of the Ftz protein itself differs between these two species, here we compare the functions of Sg-Ftz and Dm-Ftz proteins by expressing both in Drosophila embryos. Sg-ftz mimics only poorly several segmentation roles of Dm-ftz (engrailed activation, wingless repression, and embryonic cuticle transformation). However, the two proteins are similarly active in the rescue of a CNS-specific ftz mutant. These findings argue that this ftz CNS function is mediated by conserved parts of the protein, while efficient pair-rule function requires sequences present specifically in the Drosophila protein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11566109     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00425-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  10 in total

1.  Surprising flexibility in a conserved Hox transcription factor over 550 million years of evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jeffrey W Shultz; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Diversification and Functional Evolution of HOX Proteins.

Authors:  Narendra Pratap Singh; Robb Krumlauf
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-05-13

3.  Expression profiling of homeobox genes in silk gland development in the mulberry silkworm Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Sangeeta Dhawan; K P Gopinathan
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Variation and constraint in Hox gene evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jie Xiang; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolution of an insect-specific GROUCHO-interaction motif in the ENGRAILED selector protein.

Authors:  Chris Todd Hittinger; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Evolution of Hox3 and ftz in arthropods: insights from the crustacean Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Daniel Papillon; Maximilian J Telford
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 7.  Evolution at two levels: on genes and form.

Authors:  Sean B Carroll
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  The bristle patterning genes hairy and extramacrochaetae regulate the development of structures required for flight in Diptera.

Authors:  Marta Costa; Manuel Calleja; Claudio R Alonso; Pat Simpson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Composition and genomic organization of arthropod Hox clusters.

Authors:  Ryan M Pace; Miodrag Grbić; Lisa M Nagy
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  Phylogeny of the insect homeobox gene (hox) cluster.

Authors:  Sangeeta Dhawan; K P Gopinathan
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.691

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.