Literature DB >> 11566098

Drosophila fushi tarazu. a gene on the border of homeotic function.

U Löhr1, M Yussa, L Pick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hox genes specify cell fate and regional identity during animal development. These genes are present in evolutionarily conserved clusters thought to have arisen by gene duplication and divergence. Most members of the Drosophila Hox complex (HOM-C) have homeotic functions. However, a small number of HOM-C genes, such as the segmentation gene fushi tarazu (ftz), have nonhomeotic functions. If these genes arose from a homeotic ancestor, their functional properties must have changed significantly during the evolution of modern Drosophila.
RESULTS: Here, we have asked how Drosophila ftz evolved from an ancestral homeotic gene to obtain a novel function in segmentation. We expressed Ftz proteins at various developmental stages to assess their potential to regulate segmentation and to generate homeotic transformations. Drosophila Ftz protein has lost the inherent ability to mediate homeosis and functions exclusively in segmentation pathways. In contrast, Ftz from the primitive insect Tribolium (Tc-Ftz) has retained homeotic potential, generating homeotic transformations in larvae and adults and retaining the ability to repress homothorax, a hallmark of homeotic genes. Similarly, Schistocerca Ftz (Sg-Ftz) caused homeotic transformations of antenna toward leg. Primitive Ftz orthologs have moderate segmentation potential, reflected by weak interactions with the segmentation-specific cofactor Ftz-F1. Thus, Ftz orthologs represent evolutionary intermediates that have weak segmentation potential but retain the ability to act as homeotic genes.
CONCLUSIONS: ftz evolved from an ancestral homeotic gene as a result of changes in both regulation of expression and specific alterations in the protein-coding region. Studies of ftz orthologs from primitive insects have provided a "snap-shot" view of the progressive evolution of a Hox protein as it took on segmentation function and lost homeotic potential. We propose that the specialization of Drosophila Ftz for segmentation resulted from loss and gain of specific domains that mediate interactions with distinct cofactors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11566098     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00443-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  23 in total

1.  Surprising flexibility in a conserved Hox transcription factor over 550 million years of evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jeffrey W Shultz; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A novel boundary element may facilitate independent gene regulation in the Antennapedia complex of Drosophila.

Authors:  Vladimir E Belozerov; Parimal Majumder; Ping Shen; Haini N Cai
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Long-range enhancer-promoter interactions in the Scr-Antp interval of the Drosophila Antennapedia complex.

Authors:  Vincent C Calhoun; Michael Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Regulatory evolution through divergence of a phosphoswitch in the transcription factor CEBPB.

Authors:  Vincent J Lynch; Gemma May; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Conservation and variation in pair-rule gene expression and function in the intermediate-germ beetle Dermestes maculatus.

Authors:  Jie Xiang; Katie Reding; Alison Heffer; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Expression profiling of homeobox genes in silk gland development in the mulberry silkworm Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Sangeeta Dhawan; K P Gopinathan
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 7.  Use with caution: developmental systems divergence and potential pitfalls of animal models.

Authors:  Vincent J Lynch
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2009-06

Review 8.  Hox genes, evo-devo, and the case of the ftz gene.

Authors:  Leslie Pick
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Variation and constraint in Hox gene evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jie Xiang; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  An empirical test for branch-specific positive selection.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Nickel; David L Tefft; Karrie Goglin; Mark D Adams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.