Literature DB >> 11564387

Long-term efficacy and safety of propafenone and sotalol for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion of recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

F Bellandi1, I Simonetti, M Leoncini, F Frascarelli, T Giovannini, M Maioli, R P Dabizzi.   

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate, using a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol, the long-term efficacy and safety of propafenone and sotalol in maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion of recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with recurrent AF has several potential benefits, the most important being a reduced risk of thromboembolic events. Three hundred patients with recurrent AF (> or = 4 episodes in the last year) and AF at enrollment lasting < 48 hours were randomized to receive either propafenone (mean daily dose 13 +/- 1.5 mg/kg; 102 patients), sotalol (mean daily dose 3 +/- 0.4 mg/kg; 106 patients), or placebo (92 patients). After 1-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion of patients remaining in sinus rhythm were comparable between propafenone (63%) and sotalol (73%) and superior to placebo (35%; p = 0.001 vs both drugs). Symptomatic recurrences occurred later with propafenone and sotalol than with placebo. Nine patients (9%) in the propafenone group, 11 (10%) in the sotalol group, and 3 (3%) in the placebo group discontinued therapy due to adverse effects. Malignant nonfatal arrhythmias due to proarrhythmic effects were documented with sotalol only, and occurred < 72 hours from the beginning of therapy in 4 patients (4%). During recurrences, the ventricular rate was significantly reduced in patients taking propafenone and sotalol (p = 0.001 for both drugs vs placebo). The likelihood of remaining in sinus rhythm during follow-up was higher in younger patients with smaller left atrial size and without concomitant heart disease. In patients with recurrent symptomatic AF, propafenone and sotalol are not significantly different from each other and are superior to placebo in maintaining sinus rhythm at 1 year. Recurrences occur later and tend to be less symptomatic with propafenone and sotalol compared with placebo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11564387     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01806-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

Review 1.  Rhythm control and cardioversion.

Authors:  N Sulke; F Sayers; G Y H Lip
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Who Needs Pharmacologic Therapy?

Authors:  Christopher P Porterfield; Rohit Malhotra
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-06-30

Review 4.  Atrial fibrillation in the elderly: facts and management.

Authors:  Guy Chatap; Karine Giraud; Jean-Pierre Vincent
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Novel insights into the cellular basis of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Vickas V Patel
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2010-07

6.  Propafenone suppresses esophageal cancer proliferation through inducing mitochondrial dysfunction.

Authors:  Wei-Bin Zheng; Yang-Jia Li; Yang Wang; Jie Yang; Can-Can Zheng; Xiao-Hui Huang; Bin Li; Qing-Yu He
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Melanocyte-like cells in the heart and pulmonary veins contribute to atrial arrhythmia triggers.

Authors:  Mark D Levin; Min Min Lu; Nataliya B Petrenko; Brian J Hawkins; Tara H Gupta; Deborah Lang; Peter T Buckley; Jeanine Jochems; Fang Liu; Christopher F Spurney; Li J Yuan; Jason T Jacobson; Christopher B Brown; Li Huang; Friedrich Beermann; Kenneth B Margulies; Muniswamy Madesh; James H Eberwine; Jonathan A Epstein; Vickas V Patel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Lucie Valembois; Etienne Audureau; Andrea Takeda; Witold Jarzebowski; Joël Belmin; Carmelo Lafuente-Lafuente
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-04

9.  Which antiarrhythmic drug to choose after electrical cardioversion: A study on non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients.

Authors:  Hye Bin Gwag; Kwang Jin Chun; Jin Kyung Hwang; Seung-Jung Park; June Soo Kim; Kyoung-Min Park; Young Keun On
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation stratified according to renal function: Post hoc analyses of the EURIDIS-ADONIS trials.

Authors:  Munveer Thind; Wojciech Zareba; Dan Atar; Harry J G M Crijns; Jun Zhu; Hui-Nam Pak; James Reiffel; Ulf Ludwigs; Mattias Wieloch; John Stewart; Peter Kowey
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.