Literature DB >> 11564318

Functional anatomical correlates of controlled and automatic processing.

J M Jansma1, N F Ramsey, H A Slagter, R S Kahn.   

Abstract

Behavioral studies have shown that consistent practice of a cognitive task can increase the speed of performance and reduce variability of responses and error rate, reflecting a shift from controlled to automatic processing. This study examines how the shift from controlled to automatic processing changes brain activity. A verbal Sternberg task was used with continuously changing targets (novel task, NT) and with constant, practiced targets (practiced task, PT). NT and PT were presented in a blocked design and contrasted to a choice reaction time (RT) control task (CT) to isolate working memory (WM)-related activity. The three-dimensional (3-D) PRESTO functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sequence was used to measure hemodynamic responses. Behavioral data revealed that task processing became automated after practice, as responses were faster, less variable, and more accurate. This was accompanied specifically by a decrease in activation in regions related to WM (bilateral but predominantly left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), right superior frontal cortex (SFC), and right frontopolar area) and the supplementary motor area. Results showed no evidence for a shift of foci of activity within or across regions of the brain. The findings have theoretical implications for understanding the functional anatomical substrates of automatic and controlled processing, indicating that these types of information processing have the same functional anatomical substrate, but differ in efficiency. In addition, there are practical implications for interpreting activity as a measure for task performance, such as in patient studies. Whereas reduced activity can reflect poor performance if a task is not sensitive to practice effects, it can reflect good performance if a task is sensitive to practice effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11564318     DOI: 10.1162/08989290152541403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  69 in total

1.  Missing the sweet spot disengagement in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Richard S E Keefe
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2006-07

Review 2.  The automatic and controlled information-processing dissociation: is it still relevant?

Authors:  Smadar Birnboim
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Don't think of a white bear: an fMRI investigation of the effects of sequential instructional sets on cortical activity in a task-switching paradigm.

Authors:  Glenn R Wylie; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Neuronal effects following working memory training.

Authors:  Martin Buschkuehl; Susanne M Jaeggi; John Jonides
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.464

5.  Behavioral plasticity of antisaccade performance following daily practice.

Authors:  Kara A Dyckman; Jennifer E McDowell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Stuttered and fluent speech production: an ALE meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Steven Brown; Roger J Ingham; Janis C Ingham; Angela R Laird; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity.

Authors:  J Jay Todd; René Marois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Understanding VAS valuations: qualitative data on the cognitive process.

Authors:  Sylvie M C van Osch; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Distinct basal ganglia territories are engaged in early and advanced motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Stéphane Lehéricy; Habib Benali; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac; Tobias Waechter; Kamil Ugurbil; Julien Doyon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Incidental use of ecstasy: no evidence for harmful effects on cognitive brain function in a prospective fMRI study.

Authors:  Gerry Jager; Maartje M de Win; Hylke K Vervaeke; Thelma Schilt; Rene S Kahn; Wim van den Brink; Jan M van Ree; Nick F Ramsey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.