Literature DB >> 11564050

Therapeutic drug monitoring: antiarrhythmic drugs.

T J Campbell1, K M Williams.   

Abstract

Antiarrhythmic agents are traditionally classified according to Vaughan Williams into four classes of action. Class I antiarrhythmic agents include most of the drugs traditionally thought of as antiarrhythmics, and have as a common action, blockade of the fast-inward sodium channel on myocardium. These agents have a very significant toxicity, and while they are being used less, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) does significantly increase the safety with which they can be administered. Class II agents are antisympathetic drugs, particularly the b-adrenoceptor blockers. These are generally safe agents which do not normally require TDM. Class III antiarrhythmic agents include sotalol and amiodarone. TDM can be useful in the case of amiodarone to monitor compliance and toxicity but is generally of little value for sotalol. Class IV antiarrhythmic drugs are the calcium channel blockers verapamil and diltiazem. These are normally monitored by haemodynamic effects, rather than using TDM. Other agents which do not fall neatly into the Vaughan Williams classification include digoxin and perhexiline. TDM is very useful for monitoring the administration (and particularly the safety) of both of these agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11564050      PMCID: PMC2014627          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.0520s1021.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  12 in total

1.  Monitoring therapy.

Authors:  J K Aronson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic tests as tools in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Eveline Jaquenoud Sirot; Jan Willem van der Velden; Katharina Rentsch; Chin B Eap; Pierre Baumann
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Quality of requests for serum digoxin concentrations: experience from an Australian regional health service.

Authors:  Chris Ellington; Nick Grgurinovich; John O Miners; Arduino A Mangoni
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Monitoring for harms of therapy.

Authors:  J K Aronson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  A novel mechanism for the treatment of angina, arrhythmias, and diastolic dysfunction: inhibition of late I(Na) using ranolazine.

Authors:  Lars S Maier
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.105

6.  Quantitative prediction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6-mediated drug interactions.

Authors:  Michel Tod; Sylvain Goutelle; Fannie Clavel-Grabit; Grégoire Nicolas; Bruno Charpiat
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Late sodium current: A mechanism for angina, heart failure, and arrhythmia.

Authors:  Jonathan C Makielski
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 6.677

8.  Optimal sampling time and clinical implication of the SCN5A promoter haplotype in propafenone therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Kosuke Doki; Yuki Shirayama; Yukio Sekiguchi; Kazutaka Aonuma; Yukinao Kohda; Masato Homma
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Patterned cardiomyocytes on microelectrode arrays as a functional, high information content drug screening platform.

Authors:  Anupama Natarajan; Maria Stancescu; Vipra Dhir; Christopher Armstrong; Frank Sommerhage; James J Hickman; Peter Molnar
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Relevance of the drug-drug interactions between lidocaine and the pharmacokinetic enhancers ritonavir and cobicistat.

Authors:  Bart G J Dekkers; Wouter F W Bierman; Daan J Touw; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.177

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.