Literature DB >> 11562156

Differences in health and taste attitudes and reported behaviour among Finnish, Dutch and British consumers: a cross-national validation of the Health and Taste Attitude Scales (HTAS).

K Roininen1, H Tuorila, E H Zandstra, C de Graaf, K Vehkalahti, K Stubenitsky, D J Mela.   

Abstract

The Health and Taste Attitude Scales (HTAS) developed by Roininen, Lähteenmäki and Tuorila in 1999 measure the importance of health and taste aspects of foods in the food choice process. These multi-item scales consist of sets of statements, ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree", which further divide into three Health (General health interest, Light product interest and Natural product interest) and three Taste (Craving for sweet foods, Using food as a reward and Pleasure) sub-scales. Finnish (N=467), Dutch (N=477), and British (N=361) respondents completed a questionnaire which contained four components: the HTAS, a separate "paper and pencil task" of choosing a food for a snack; pleasantness, healthiness and frequency of consumption of eight foods; and the Restraint Eating Scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ). The latter three components were included in order to validate various aspects of the HTAS. The factor structure of HTAS was found to be equal in all three countries. However, there were some minor differences in factor loadings among countries, e.g. the Natural product interest and Pleasure sub-scale items had lower factor loadings in the UK than in Finland and The Netherlands. Finnish respondents had the most positive attitude towards light products. Dutch and British respondents scored higher on all Taste sub-scales than their Finnish counterparts. Respondents' health-related attitudes were good predictors of their "healthy food choices" in the snack task and self-reported consumption. Two of the Taste sub-scales (Craving for sweet foods and Using food as a reward) predicted well respondents' self-reported consumption of, for example, full-fat chocolate bars. All the Health and two of the Taste sub-scales proved to be useful tools for characterizing consumer attitudes within and between countries. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11562156     DOI: 10.1006/appe.2001.0414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  25 in total

1.  Measuring practical knowledge about balanced meals: development and validation of the brief PKB-7 scale.

Authors:  S Mötteli; J Barbey; C Keller; T Bucher; M Siegrist
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Influence of the fiber from agro-industrial co-products as functional food ingredient on the acceptance, neophobia and sensory characteristics of cooked sausages.

Authors:  Juan Díaz-Vela; Alfonso Totosaus; Héctor B Escalona-Buendía; M Lourdes Pérez-Chabela
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Adherence to Nordic dietary patterns and risk of first-trimester spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Anne Sofie Dam Laursen; Benjamin Randeris Johannesen; Sydney K Willis; Elizabeth E Hatch; Lauren A Wise; Amelia K Wesselink; Kenneth J Rothman; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Ellen Margrethe Mikkelsen
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.865

Review 4.  Measuring and Leveraging Motives and Values in Dietary Interventions.

Authors:  Sarah J Eustis; Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Swann A Adams; James R Hébert
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Food stress in Adelaide: the relationship between low income and the affordability of healthy food.

Authors:  Paul R Ward; Fiona Verity; Patricia Carter; George Tsourtos; John Coveney; Kwan Chui Wong
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2013-01-29

6.  The creation of a healthy eating motivation score and its association with food choice and physical activity in a cross sectional sample of Irish adults.

Authors:  Paul Naughton; Sinéad N McCarthy; Mary B McCarthy
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Heterogeneous risk perceptions: the case of poultry meat purchase intentions in Finland.

Authors:  Jaakko Heikkilä; Eija Pouta; Sari Forsman-Hugg; Johanna Mäkelä
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Sweet lies: neural, visual, and behavioral measures reveal a lack of self-control conflict during food choice in weight-concerned women.

Authors:  Laura N van der Laan; Denise T D de Ridder; Lisette Charbonnier; Max A Viergever; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  An assessment of the test-retest reliability of the New Nordic Diet score.

Authors:  Helga Birgit Bjørnarå; Elisabet Rudjord Hillesund; Monica Klungland Torstveit; Tonje Holte Stea; Nina Cecilie Øverby; Elling Bere
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Effects of an isocaloric healthy Nordic diet on insulin sensitivity, lipid profile and inflammation markers in metabolic syndrome -- a randomized study (SYSDIET).

Authors:  M Uusitupa; K Hermansen; M J Savolainen; U Schwab; M Kolehmainen; L Brader; L S Mortensen; L Cloetens; A Johansson-Persson; G Onning; M Landin-Olsson; K-H Herzig; J Hukkanen; F Rosqvist; D Iggman; J Paananen; K J Pulkki; M Siloaho; L Dragsted; T Barri; K Overvad; K E Bach Knudsen; M S Hedemann; P Arner; I Dahlman; G I A Borge; P Baardseth; S M Ulven; I Gunnarsdottir; S Jónsdóttir; I Thorsdottir; M Orešič; K S Poutanen; U Risérus; B Akesson
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.