Literature DB >> 11560454

Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. A randomized, controlled trial.

M Boogaerts1, D J Winston, E J Bow, G Garber, A C Reboli, A P Schwarer, N Novitzky, A Boehme, E Chwetzoff, K De Beule.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amphotericin B deoxycholate is currently the standard empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer who have persistent fever that does not respond to antibiotic therapy. However, this treatment often causes infusion-related and metabolic toxicities, which may be dose limiting.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of itraconazole with those of amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy.
DESIGN: An open randomized, controlled, multicenter trial, powered for equivalence.
SETTING: 60 oncology centers in 10 countries. PATIENTS: 384 neutropenic patients with cancer who had persistent fever that did not respond to antibiotic therapy. INTERVENTION: Intravenous amphotericin B or intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole solution. MEASUREMENTS: Defervescence, breakthrough fungal infection, drug-related adverse events, and death.
RESULTS: For itraconazole and amphotericin B, the median duration of therapy was 8.5 and 7 days and the median time to defervescence was 7 and 6 days, respectively. The intention-to-treat efficacy analysis of data from 360 patients showed response rates of 47% and 38% for itraconazole and amphotericin B, respectively (difference, 9.0 percentage points [95% CI, -0.8 to 19.5 percentage points]). Fewer drug-related adverse events occurred in the itraconazole group than the amphotericin B group (5% vs. 54% of patients; P = 0.001), and the rate of withdrawal because of toxicity was significantly lower with itraconazole (19% vs. 38%; P = 0.001). Significantly more amphotericin B recipients had nephrotoxicity (P < 0.001). Breakthrough fungal infections (5 patients in each group) and mortality rates (19 deaths in the itraconazole group and 25 deaths in the amphotericin B group) were similar. Sixty-five patients switched to oral itraconazole solution after receiving the intravenous formulation for a median of 9 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Itraconazole and amphotericin B have at least equivalent efficacy as empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer. However, itraconazole is associated with significantly less toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11560454     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  47 in total

1.  Nationwide survey of in vitro activities of itraconazole and voriconazole against clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates cultured between 1945 and 1998.

Authors:  Paul E Verweij; Debbie T A Te Dorsthorst; Anthonius J M M Rijs; Hilly G De Vries-Hospers; Jacques F G M Meis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Combination antifungal therapy.

Authors:  Melissa D Johnson; Conan MacDougall; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; John R Perfect; John H Rex
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Canadian clinical practice guidelines for invasive candidiasis in adults.

Authors:  Eric J Bow; Gerald Evans; Jeff Fuller; Michel Laverdière; Coleman Rotstein; Robert Rennie; Stephen D Shafran; Don Sheppard; Sylvie Carle; Peter Phillips; Donald C Vinh
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 4.  Adverse effects of antifungal therapies in invasive fungal infections: review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S B Girois; F Chapuis; E Decullier; B G P Revol
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two approaches for empirical antifungal therapy in hematological patients with persistent febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Almudena Martín-Peña; M Victoria Gil-Navarro; Manuela Aguilar-Guisado; Ildefonso Espigado; Maite Ruiz Pérez de Pipaón; José Falantes; Jerónimo Pachón; José M Cisneros
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Adverse effects of antifungal therapies in invasive fungal infections: review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S B Girois; F Chapuis; E Decullier; B G P Revol
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Breakthrough Candida krusei fungemia during fluconazole prophylaxis followed by breakthrough zygomycosis during caspofungin therapy in a patient with severe aplastic anemia who underwent stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Corrado Girmenia; Maria Luisa Moleti; Alessandra Micozzi; Anna Paola Iori; Walter Barberi; Robin Foà; Pietro Martino
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Economic evaluation of intravenous itraconazole for presumed systemic fungal infections in neutropenic patients in Korea.

Authors:  K Moeremans; L Annemans; Ji-So Ryu; Kang-Won Choe; Wan-Shik Shine
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  [Therapy of severe fungal infections].

Authors:  M Battegay; U Flückiger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.743

10.  Efficacy and safety of intravenous itraconazole as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies in Japan.

Authors:  Kensuke Ohta; Saori Nishiki Kosaka; Yoshitaka Nakao; Takeo Kumura; Kiyomichi Hagihara; Erina Sakamoto; Shuichiro Okamoto; Asao Hirose; Yasutaka Aoyama; Ryousuke Yamamura; Yoshiki Hayashi; Yukari Umemoto; Yoshiki Terada; Yasunobu Takeoka; Takahiko Nakane; Hideo Koh; Masayuki Hino
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.