Literature DB >> 11559750

Coordinating the segregation of sister chromatids during the first meiotic division: evidence for sexual dimorphism.

C A Hodges1, R LeMaire-Adkins, P A Hunt.   

Abstract

Errors during the first meiotic division are common in our species, but virtually all occur during female meiosis. The reason why oogenesis is more error prone than spermatogenesis remains unknown. Normal segregation of homologous chromosomes at the first meiotic division (MI) requires coordinated behavior of the sister chromatids of each homolog. Failure of sister kinetochores to act cooperatively at MI, or precocious sister chromatid segregation (PSCS), has been postulated to be a major contributor to human nondisjunction. To investigate the factors that influence PSCS we utilized the XO mouse, since the chromatids of the single X chromosome frequently segregate at MI, and the propensity for PSCS is influenced by genetic background. Our studies demonstrate that the strain-specific differences in PSCS are due to the actions of an autosomal trans-acting factor or factors. Since components of the synaptonemal complex are thought to play a role in centromere cohesion and kinetochore orientation, we evaluated the behavior of the X chromosome at prophase to determine if this factor influenced the propensity of the chromosome for self-synapsis. We were unable to directly correlate synaptic differences with subsequent segregation behavior. However, unexpectedly, we uncovered a sexual dimorphism that may partially explain sex-specific differences in the fidelity of meiotic chromosome segregation. Specifically, in the male remnants of the synaptonemal complex remain associated with the centromeres until anaphase of the second meiotic division (MII), whereas in the female, all traces of synaptonemal complex (SC) protein components are lost from the chromosomes before the onset of the first meiotic division. This finding suggests a sex-specific difference in the components used to correctly segregate chromosomes during meiosis, and may provide a reason for the high error frequency during female meiosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11559750     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.114.13.2417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  21 in total

1.  Sex-specific differences in meiotic chromosome segregation revealed by dicentric bridge resolution in mice.

Authors:  Kara E Koehler; Elise A Millie; Jonathan P Cherry; Paul S Burgoyne; Edward P Evans; Patricia A Hunt; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Molecular analysis of nondisjunction in mice heterozygous for a Robertsonian translocation.

Authors:  Lara A Underkoffler; Laura E Mitchell; A Russell Localio; Shannon M Marchegiani; Justin Morabito; Joelle N Collins; Rebecca J Oakey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Maternal transmission ratio distortion at the mouse Om locus results from meiotic drive at the second meiotic division.

Authors:  Guangming Wu; Lanping Hao; Zhiming Han; Shaorong Gao; Keith E Latham; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Paul S Burgoyne; Shantha K Mahadevaiah; James M A Turner
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  The cohesin subunit RAD21L functions in meiotic synapsis and exhibits sexual dimorphism in fertility.

Authors:  Yurema Herrán; Cristina Gutiérrez-Caballero; Manuel Sánchez-Martín; Teresa Hernández; Alberto Viera; José Luis Barbero; Enrique de Álava; Dirk G de Rooij; José Ángel Suja; Elena Llano; Alberto M Pendás
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Differential immunolocalization of a putative Rec8p in meiotic autosomes and sex chromosomes of triatomine bugs.

Authors:  M I Pigozzi; A J Solari
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Female-specific features of recombinational double-stranded DNA repair in relation to synapsis and telomere dynamics in human oocytes.

Authors:  I Roig; B Liebe; J Egozcue; Ll Cabero; M Garcia; H Scherthan
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-07-03       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Developmental control of sumoylation pathway proteins in mouse male germ cells.

Authors:  Sophie La Salle; Fengyun Sun; Xiang-Dong Zhang; Michael J Matunis; Mary Ann Handel
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Cohesin component dynamics during meiotic prophase I in mammalian oocytes.

Authors:  Ignacio Prieto; Charles Tease; Nieves Pezzi; Jose M Buesa; Sagrario Ortega; Leonor Kremer; Alicia Martínez; Carlos Martínez-A; Maj A Hultén; José L Barbero
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Mutations of the SYCP3 gene in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Hasbaira Bolor; Terumi Mori; Sachie Nishiyama; Yoshimasa Ito; Eriko Hosoba; Hidehito Inagaki; Hiroshi Kogo; Tamae Ohye; Makiko Tsutsumi; Takema Kato; Maoqing Tong; Haruki Nishizawa; Kanako Pryor-Koishi; Eri Kitaoka; Tomio Sawada; Yukio Nishiyama; Yasuhiro Udagawa; Hiroki Kurahashi
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.