Literature DB >> 11559457

Does timely assessment affect the anxiety associated with an abnormal mammogram result?

J Haas1, C Kaplan, A McMillan, L J Esserman.   

Abstract

Anxiety following an abnormal mammogram result can be substantial. We examined whether the time to the first diagnostic test was associated with anxiety. We surveyed 449 women at 2 and 8 months after an abnormal mammogram result, and we reviewed their medical records. Twenty-six percent of women reported being very anxious about their abnormal mammogram result at the time of the two-month interview, and 22% reported persistent anxiety after 8 months. After adjustment, the number of days until the first diagnostic test was not associated with anxiety at the 2-month interview. By the second interview, women who received their first diagnostic test within the first week were significantly more anxious, as were women who did not receive their first test for at least 60 days after their results. Further work is needed to ascertain how to minimize the anxiety associated with the evaluation of an abnormal mammogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11559457     DOI: 10.1089/15246090152543184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med        ISSN: 1524-6094


  5 in total

1.  Language barriers, location of care, and delays in follow-up of abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  Leah S Karliner; Lin Ma; Michael Hofmann; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Waiting time and the psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography: cohort study.

Authors:  Bruno Heleno; Volkert Siersma; John Brodersen
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2015-04-30

3.  Mammography facilities serving vulnerable women have longer follow-up times.

Authors:  Leah S Karliner; Celia Kaplan; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Delayed or failure to follow-up abnormal breast cancer screening mammograms in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeanette C Reece; Eleanor F G Neal; Peter Nguyen; Jennifer G McIntosh; Jon D Emery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Nicole B Gabler; Cosette M Wheeler; Anne Marie McCarthy; Philip E Castle; Ethan A Halm; Mitchell D Schnall; Celette S Skinner; Anna N A Tosteson; Donald L Weaver; Anil Vachani; Shivan J Mehta; Katharine A Rendle; Stacey A Fedewa; Douglas A Corley; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 508.702

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.