Literature DB >> 1155918

Comparison of sisomicin and gentamicin in bacteriuric patients with underlying diseases of the urinary tract.

J Klastersky, C Hensgens, M Gerard, D Daneau.   

Abstract

Sisomicin and gentamicin (2 mg/kg) were administered in a random fashion to patients with bacteriuria superimposed on abnormalities of the urinary tract. Cure was achieved in a similar number of patients in both groups, but superinfection and reinfection with resistant microorganisms was more frequent in patients receiving gentamicin. Untoward side effects were not frequent in this series, especially if the serious underlying urological disease of most patients is taken into consideration. The susceptibility of the causative pathogens to the antibiotic administered and the severity of the underlying disease were the most important factors in the outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1155918      PMCID: PMC429220          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.7.6.742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  7 in total

1.  Antibacterial activity in serum and urine as a therapeutic guide in bacterial infections.

Authors:  J Klastersky; D Daneau; G Swings; D Weerts
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Sisomicin: Bacteriological and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  J Klastersky; C Hensgens; M Gérad; D Daneau
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  Antipseudomonal drugs: comparative study of gentamicin, sisomicin and tobramycin in vitro and in human volunteers.

Authors:  J Klastersky; A Henri; C Hensgens; L Vandenborre; D Daneau
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Disc plate method of microbiological antibiotic assay. II. Novel procedure offering improved accuracy.

Authors:  W W Davis; T R Stout
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-10

5.  Disc plate method of microbiological antibiotic assay. I. Factors influencing variability and error.

Authors:  W W Davis; T R Stout
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-10

6.  Comparative activity of sisomicin, gentamicin, kanamycin, and tobramycin.

Authors:  J A Waitz; E L Moss; C G Drube; M J Weinstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In vitro bactericidal effectiveness of four aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Authors:  P J Hyams; M S Simberkoff; J J Rahal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 5.191

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  In vitro activity of netilmicin.

Authors:  J A Smith; J R Morgan; M Mogyoros
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Sisomicin, netilmicin and dibekacin. A review of their antibacterial activity and therapeutic use.

Authors:  P Noone
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Clinico-pharmacological studies of sisomicin in ill children.

Authors:  M I Marks; A Vose; S Hammerberg; R Dugal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  [Experience with sisomicin in pediatrics (author's transl)].

Authors:  L Weingärtner; U Sitka; R Patsch; U Burchardt; I Richter
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  [Pharmacokinetic and clinical studies with sisomicin in paediatrics (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Doerck; G Fricke; G Gruenwaldt; H M von Hattingberg; M Scheer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.553

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.