Literature DB >> 11557930

Bad peer reviewers.

.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11557930     DOI： 10.1038/35093213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: an exploratory study.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Christina Gutierrez-Ford; Shyamal Peddada
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Susan A Elmore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?

Authors:  Aceil Al-Khatib; Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Erik Cobo; Albert Selva-O'Callagham; Josep-Maria Ribera; Francesc Cardellach; Ruth Dominguez; Miquel Vilardell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.