Literature DB >> 11557798

A simulation study of the reliability of recombination detection methods.

C Wiuf1, T Christensen, J Hein.   

Abstract

There exist many methods to detect recombination or mosaic structure in a sample of DNA sequences. But how reliable are they? Four methods were investigated with respect to their power to detect recombination in simulated samples with different amounts of recombination and mutation. In addition, we investigated the impact of the shape of the underlying genealogy on their performances. We found that the methods detected far fewer recombinations than were theoretically possible and that methods based on the principle of incompatibility in general had more power than methods that did not make use of this principle explicitly. This seemed, in particular, to be the case for phylogenies generated under population expansion scenarios which result in long branches at the tips and small deep branches. In addition to the results obtained through simulations, a series of new theoretical results on recombination is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11557798     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  46 in total

1.  Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: computer simulations.

Authors:  D Posada; K A Crandall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Recombination detection under evolutionary scenarios relevant to functional divergence.

Authors:  Rachael A Bay; Joseph P Bielawski
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Properties of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees.

Authors:  James H Degnan; Michael DeGiorgio; David Bryant; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Evidence for widespread reticulate evolution within human duplicons.

Authors:  Michael S Jackson; Karen Oliver; Jane Loveland; Sean Humphray; Ian Dunham; Mariano Rocchi; Luigi Viggiano; Jonathan P Park; Matthew E Hurles; Mauro Santibanez-Koref
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Evidence of recombination in the norovirus capsid gene.

Authors:  Jacques Rohayem; Julia Münch; Axel Rethwilm
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Approximating the coalescent with recombination.

Authors:  Gilean A T McVean; Niall J Cardin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  MinPD: distance-based phylogenetic analysis and recombination detection of serially-sampled HIV quasispecies.

Authors:  Patricia Buendia; Giri Narasimhan
Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf       Date:  2004

8.  Recombination estimation under complex evolutionary models with the coalescent composite-likelihood method.

Authors:  Antonio Carvajal-Rodríguez; Keith A Crandall; David Posada
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  A revised evolutionary history of the CYP1A subfamily: gene duplication, gene conversion, and positive selection.

Authors:  Heather M H Goldstone; John J Stegeman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Identification of genes subject to positive selection in uropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli: a comparative genomics approach.

Authors:  Swaine L Chen; Chia-Seui Hung; Jian Xu; Christopher S Reigstad; Vincent Magrini; Aniko Sabo; Darin Blasiar; Tamberlyn Bieri; Rekha R Meyer; Philip Ozersky; Jon R Armstrong; Robert S Fulton; J Phillip Latreille; John Spieth; Thomas M Hooton; Elaine R Mardis; Scott J Hultgren; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.