Literature DB >> 11556742

Adhesion of corneal epithelial cells to cell adhesion peptide modified pHEMA surfaces.

K Merrett1, C M Griffith, Y Deslandes, G Pleizier, H Sheardown.   

Abstract

Epithelialization of a corneal implant is a desirable property. In this study we compared surface modification of poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) with the cell adhesion peptides RGDS and YIGSR. Various parameters in the tresyl chloride activation and modification reactions were considered in order to maximize surface coverage with the peptide including tresyl chloride reaction solvent. tresyl chloride reaction time, tresyl chloride concentration, peptide concentration, and peptide reaction pH. Surface chemistry and corneal epithelial cell adhesion to the modified surfaces were examined. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data suggested that while peptide modification had occurred, surface coverage with the peptide was incomplete. Acetone was found to result in a higher fraction of nitrogen and surface bound carboxyl groups compared to dioxane and ether. Furthermore, corneal epithelial cell adhesion to the surfaces for which acetone was used for the activation reaction was significantly greater. Statistical analysis of the various samples suggests that lower peptide concentrations and higher tresyl chloride reaction times result in better cell adhesion. Furthermore, modification with YIGSR resulted in higher surface concentrations and better cell adhesion than modification with RGDS. Little or no cell adhesion was noted on the unmodified pHEMA controls. Protein adsorption results suggest that the differences in cell adhesion cannot be attributed to differences in serum protein adsorption from the culture medium. We conclude that YIGSR modified surfaces have significant potential for further development in corneal applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11556742     DOI: 10.1163/156856201316883467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed        ISSN: 0920-5063            Impact factor:   3.517


  6 in total

Review 1.  Conducting polymer-hydrogels for medical electrode applications.

Authors:  Rylie A Green; Sungchul Baek; Laura A Poole-Warren; Penny J Martens
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 8.090

2.  Cell Loaded GelMA:HEMA IPN hydrogels for corneal stroma engineering.

Authors:  Cemile Kilic Bektas; Vasif Hasirci
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Bioactive interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels that support corneal epithelial wound healing.

Authors:  David Myung; Nabeel Farooqui; Luo Luo Zheng; Wongun Koh; Sarita Gupta; Amit Bakri; Jaan Noolandi; Jennifer R Cochran; Curtis W Frank; Christopher N Ta
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Effects of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone) hydrogel implants on myopic and normal chick sclera.

Authors:  James Su; Elena Iomdina; Elena Tarutta; Brian Ward; Jie Song; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Incorporation of Exogenous RGD Peptide and Inter-Species Blending as Strategies for Enhancing Human Corneal Limbal Epithelial Cell Growth on Bombyx mori Silk Fibroin Membranes.

Authors:  Laura J Bray; Shuko Suzuki; Damien G Harkin; Traian V Chirila
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2013-05-17

Review 6.  Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency: Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  Michel Haagdorens; Sara Ilse Van Acker; Veerle Van Gerwen; Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill; Carina Koppen; Marie-José Tassignon; Nadia Zakaria
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.443

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.