Literature DB >> 11556432

Treatment of common mental disorders in Australian general practice.

I B Hickie1, T A Davenport, S L Naismith, E M Scott, D Hadzi-Pavlovic, A Koschera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates and predictors of treatments for patients with common mental disorders in Australian general practice. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Cross-sectional national audit of general practices throughout Australia in 1998-1999. PARTICIPANTS: 46 515 ambulatory care patients attending 386 GPs. SCREENING TOOLS: Prevalence of common mental disorders--12 items from the 34-item SPHERE self-report questionnaire and associated classification system; pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment provided, as reported by the GPs--questions relating to treatments provided; predictors of treatments--self-report questions about demography for patients and GPs, and about practice organisation for GPs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: GPs' reported provision of pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments; and patient, GP and practice characteristics predicting treatment provision.
RESULTS: There were complete data on treatment for 39 983 patients. 27% (10752) of all patients received some form of intervention; 21% (8304) received non-pharmacological and 12% (4765) received pharmacological treatments. Non-pharmacological treatments were mostly non-specific counselling and support (83%; 6892/8304). Among the 10303 patients with the most severe level of psychological disorders, only 50% (5152) received any intervention (38% [3872] received non-pharmacological and 27% [2766] pharmacological treatments). Evidence-based treatments were provided to only 12% (4961) of all patients (and only 27% [2802] of the 10303 with the most severe disorders). Although the newer antidepressant agents were commonly prescribed, older medications (mainly tricyclic antidepressants) were prescribed to older (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.56), less educated (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.79) and female (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.23-1.70) patients. Among the 8304 patients receiving non-pharmacological treatments, specific (evidence-based) treatments were provided to only 17% (1412); these patients were typically middle-aged (OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 2.32-3.73) and the providing GPs were typically not in full-time practice (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.56-4.17).
CONCLUSION: Practitioners largely provide non-specific, non-pharmacological interventions for patients with common mental disorders. Even among those with the most severe disorders, only a minority receive pharmacological or specific evidence-based non-pharmacological treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11556432     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143786.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  10 in total

1.  Is depression overdiagnosed? No.

Authors:  Ian Hickie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-18

2.  Collaboration between primary care and psychiatric services: does it help family physicians?

Authors:  Stephen Kisely; Debbie Duerden; Susan Shaddick; Ajantha Jayabarathan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A controlled trial of internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for panic disorder with face-to-face support from a general practitioner or email support from a psychologist.

Authors:  Ciaran Pier; David W Austin; Britt Klein; Joanna Mitchell; Peter Schattner; Lisa Ciechomski; Kathryn J Gilson; David Pierce; Kerrie Shandley; Victoria Wade
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2008-03

4.  Association between antidepressant prescribing and suicide in Australia, 1991-2000: trend analysis.

Authors:  Wayne D Hall; Andrea Mant; Philip B Mitchell; Valerie A Rendle; Ian B Hickie; Peter McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-10

5.  Recognition and treatment of depression: a comparison of Australian and Chinese medical students.

Authors:  Ye Rong; Georgina M Luscombe; Tracey A Davenport; Yueqin Huang; Nick Glozier; Ian B Hickie
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  The contribution of general practice based research to the development of national policy: case studies from Ireland and Australia.

Authors:  J E Pirkis; G A Blashki; A W Murphy; I B Hickie; L Ciechomski
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2006-05-11

7.  General Practitioners' opinions on their practice in mental health and their collaboration with mental health professionals.

Authors:  Nadia Younes; Isabelle Gasquet; Pierre Gaudebout; Marie-Pierre Chaillet; Viviane Kovess; Bruno Falissard; Marie-Christine Hardy Bayle
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Distress and disability in young adults presenting to clinical services with mood disorders.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Scott; Daniel F Hermens; Sharon L Naismith; Adam J Guastella; Django White; Bradley G Whitwell; Jim Lagopoulos; Jan Scott; Ian B Hickie
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2013-10-17

9.  Management of work-related common mental disorders in general practice: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  M Rivière; Y Toullic; P Lerouge; T Blanchon; A Leroyer; L Plancke; T Prazuck; M Melchior; N Younès
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Dynamic pattern of suicide in Australia, 1986-2005: a descriptive-analytic study.

Authors:  Xin Qi; Wenbiao Hu; Andrew Page; Shilu Tong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.