OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and predictors of unmet need for recognition of common mental disorders in Australian general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional national audit of general practices throughout Australia in 1998-1999. PARTICIPANTS: 46 515 ambulatory care patients attending 386 GPs. SCREENING TOOLS: Prevalence of common mental disorders--12 items from the 34-item SPHERE self-report questionnaire and associated classification system; prevalence of recognition of mental disorders by GPs--GPs reporting whether patients had depression, anxiety, mixed depression/anxiety, somatoform, or other psychological disorder; predictors of unmet need for recognition of mental disorders--self-report questions about demography for patients and GPs, and about practice organisation for GPs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported recognition of psychological disorders by GPs; actual prevalence of disorders; and patient, GP and practice characteristics predicting the failure to recognise disorders. RESULTS: GPs did not recognise mental disorder in 56% (11922/21210) of patients. These comprised 46% (5134/11060) of patients in the higher level of mental disorders, and (in the second level of disorders) 58% (2906/5036) of patients with predominantly psychological symptoms, and 76% (3882/5114) of those with predominantly somatic symptoms. Patients more likely to have their need for psychological assessment met had the following characteristics: middle-aged (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.59-1.96), female (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.27), Australian-born (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.24), unemployed (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.64-1.89), single (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.41-1.61), presenting with mainly psychological symptoms (OR, 3.54; 95% CI, 3.28-3.81), and presenting for psychological reasons (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 3.02-5.82). Characteristics of doctors associated with meeting patients' need for assessment were being aged over 35 years (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09-2.08), having an interest in mental health (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.41), having had previous mental health training (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.15-1.45), being in part-time practice (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39), seeing fewer than 100 patients per week (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.13-1.47), working in practices with fewer than 2000 patients (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.45) and working in regional centres (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28). CONCLUSION: Unmet need for recognition of common mental disorders remains high. Predictors of unmet need include a somatic symptom profile and practitioner and organisational characteristics which impede the provision of high quality mental health services.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and predictors of unmet need for recognition of common mental disorders in Australian general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional national audit of general practices throughout Australia in 1998-1999. PARTICIPANTS: 46 515 ambulatory care patients attending 386 GPs. SCREENING TOOLS: Prevalence of common mental disorders--12 items from the 34-item SPHERE self-report questionnaire and associated classification system; prevalence of recognition of mental disorders by GPs--GPs reporting whether patients had depression, anxiety, mixed depression/anxiety, somatoform, or other psychological disorder; predictors of unmet need for recognition of mental disorders--self-report questions about demography for patients and GPs, and about practice organisation for GPs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported recognition of psychological disorders by GPs; actual prevalence of disorders; and patient, GP and practice characteristics predicting the failure to recognise disorders. RESULTS: GPs did not recognise mental disorder in 56% (11922/21210) of patients. These comprised 46% (5134/11060) of patients in the higher level of mental disorders, and (in the second level of disorders) 58% (2906/5036) of patients with predominantly psychological symptoms, and 76% (3882/5114) of those with predominantly somatic symptoms. Patients more likely to have their need for psychological assessment met had the following characteristics: middle-aged (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.59-1.96), female (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.27), Australian-born (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.24), unemployed (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.64-1.89), single (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.41-1.61), presenting with mainly psychological symptoms (OR, 3.54; 95% CI, 3.28-3.81), and presenting for psychological reasons (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 3.02-5.82). Characteristics of doctors associated with meeting patients' need for assessment were being aged over 35 years (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09-2.08), having an interest in mental health (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.41), having had previous mental health training (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.15-1.45), being in part-time practice (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39), seeing fewer than 100 patients per week (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.13-1.47), working in practices with fewer than 2000 patients (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.45) and working in regional centres (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28). CONCLUSION: Unmet need for recognition of common mental disorders remains high. Predictors of unmet need include a somatic symptom profile and practitioner and organisational characteristics which impede the provision of high quality mental health services.
Authors: Norman H Rasmussen; David C Agerter; Robert C Colligan; Macaran A Baird; Charles E Yunghans; Stephen S Cha Journal: Ment Health Fam Med Date: 2008-09
Authors: Ciaran Pier; David W Austin; Britt Klein; Joanna Mitchell; Peter Schattner; Lisa Ciechomski; Kathryn J Gilson; David Pierce; Kerrie Shandley; Victoria Wade Journal: Ment Health Fam Med Date: 2008-03
Authors: Nicholas Meader; Alex J Mitchell; Carolyn Chew-Graham; David Goldberg; Maria Rizzo; Victoria Bird; David Kessler; Jon Packham; Mark Haddad; Stephen Pilling Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Madeline H Meier; Nathan A Gillespie; Narelle K Hansell; Alex W Hewitt; Ian B Hickie; Yi Lu; Stuart MacGregor; Sarah E Medland; Cong Sun; Tien Y Wong; Margaret J Wright; Gu Zhu; Nicholas G Martin; David A Mackey Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Madeline H Meier; Nathan A Gillespie; Narelle K Hansell; Alex W Hewitt; Ian B Hickie; Yi Lu; John McGrath; Stuart MacGregor; Sarah E Medland; Cong Sun; Tien Y Wong; Margaret J Wright; Gu Zhu; Nicholas G Martin; David A Mackey Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 4.939