Literature DB >> 11555320

Inhalation treatment: errors in application and difficulties in acceptance of the devices are frequent in wheezy infants and young children.

C Marguet1, L Couderc, P Le Roux, E Jeannot, V Lefay, E Mallet.   

Abstract

The recent availability of small-volume spacers has facilitated the general use of inhaled treatment in infants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate any errors made by parents when using this new inhalation technique and the child's behavior during the inhalation. Ninety-four young children (61% boys) under 5 years of age were enrolled in the study. Inhalation treatment was recommended either by a general practitioner or by a pediatrician. Data concerning treatment regimens, the ability of parents to use the spacer and metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), and the acceptance of the devices, were collected by means of a demonstration and questionnaire. Unexpectedly, the doses, administration times, and duration of the treatments varied from one child to the next. No explanation or training in administering the treatment via the spacers was given to 12% and 47% of the parents, respectively. Fourteen per cent of parents did not shake the MDIs, 12% did not monitor the valves, and 22% allowed too short a time for inhalation. The lack of explanation increased the occurrence of errors in manipulation of the devices. The procedure was judged to be easy to follow by 78% of the parents, but the face mask was accepted with difficulty by 22% of the children. Repeated crying during administration of the treatment was observed in 38% of the patients, particularly the youngest. Crying influenced the acceptance of the face mask, reduced parental compliance, and made the use of the devices more difficult. Errors altering the efficiency of inhalation treatment in infants are frequent. Most of these errors could be avoided by spending more time to inform the parents about correct usage. Furthermore, repeated crying during inhalation is common in young children and this problem should to be taken into consideration in the evaluation of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11555320     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2001.012004224.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 0905-6157            Impact factor:   6.377


  4 in total

1.  Inhalation devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Pressurised metered dose inhaler-spacer technique in young children improves with video instruction.

Authors:  Nicole Shaw; Peter Le Souëf; Lidija Turkovic; Lucy McCahon; Anthony Kicic; Peter D Sly; Sunalene Devadason; André Schultz
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  A systematic review of instruments aimed at evaluating metered-dose inhaler administration technique in children.

Authors:  Carlos E Rodríguez-Martínez; Monica P Sossa-Briceño; Gustavo Nino
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.515

4.  A retrospective population based trend analysis on hospital admissions for lower respiratory illness among Swedish children from 1987 to 2000.

Authors:  Ove Björ; Lennart Bråbäck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.