Literature DB >> 11555031

Factors influencing women's decisions for choice of surgery for Stage I and Stage II breast cancer in Western Australia.

B Mastaglia1, L J Kristjanson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internal and external factors have been reported to influence decision-making by women for breast cancer surgery. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to describe the factors those women with Stage I or Stage II breast cancer, perceived to be important when selecting either modified radical mastectomy or breast conserving treatment. DESIGN/
METHOD: A descriptive correlational study was conducted. A consecutive sample of women with a diagnosis of breast cancer during a 6-month period was selected from the Health Department of Western Australia Cancer Registry.
RESULTS: Women who had breast conserving treatment rated the surgeon's preference as a more important factor in decision-making than women who had modified radical mastectomy. The lack of difference in long-term survival between the types of surgery was also a more important influence on decision-making for the breast conserving treatment group compared with women who had received modified radical mastectomy. Women in rural areas tended to choose modified radical mastectomy rather than breast conserving treatment. The surgeon, family and general practitioner were important sources of information. A significant association was found between women's involvement in decision-making and their use of a general practitioner as an information source. Many women wanted the decision about surgery to be entirely their own; the breast conserving treatment group preferred a more active role in decision-making compared with those who chose modified radical mastectomy. Most women had participated in the decision-making process as much as they wished, had enough time in which to make their decisions and had received sufficient information. A correlation between adequacy of information and sufficient time for decision-making was found.
CONCLUSION: Findings may be useful to nurses and other health professionals who endeavour to provide adequate information and support to women during their initial treatment decision-making experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11555031     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01921.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  17 in total

1.  A qualitative study of rural women's views for the treatment of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Eli Ristevski; Melanie Regan; David Birks; Nicole Steers; Anny Byrne
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Understanding surgery choices for breast cancer: how might the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Common Sense Model contribute to decision support interventions?

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Antony S R Manstead
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Chronic diseases influence major life changing decisions: a new domain in quality of life research.

Authors:  Zu Bhatti; Ms Salek; Ay Finlay
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Weight control needs and experiences among rural breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Christie A Befort; Heather Austin; Jennifer R Klemp
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Breast-conserving surgery in Hong Kong Chinese women.

Authors:  Dacita Suen; Lorraine Chow; Ava Kwong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Mastectomy versus breast-conservation therapy: an examination of how individual, clinicopathologic, and physician factors influence decision-making.

Authors:  J Gu; M Delisle; R Engler-Stringer; G Groot
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Impact of MRI-evaluated neoadjuvant chemotherapy response on change of surgical recommendation in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Byron A Feig; David J-B Hsiang; John A Butler; Rita S Mehta; Shadfar Bahri; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A consultation with Canadian rural women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ross E Gray; Pamela James; Jackie Manthorne; Judy Gould; Margaret I Fitch
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Why do hospital mastectomy rates vary? Differences in the decision-making experiences of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  L J M Caldon; K A Collins; D J Wilde; S H Ahmedzai; T W Noble; A Stotter; D M Sibbering; S Holt; M W R Reed
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The experiential health information processing model: supporting collaborative web-based patient education.

Authors:  Laura A O'Grady; Holly Witteman; C Nadine Wathen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.