Literature DB >> 11554854

Track structures and dose distributions from decays of (131)I and (125)I in and around water spheres simulating micrometastases of differentiated thyroid cancer.

W B Li1, W Friedland, E Pomplun, P Jacob, H G Paretzke, M Lassmann, C Reiners.   

Abstract

The disintegration of the radionuclides (131)I and (125)I and the subsequent charged-particle tracks left behind in water (as a model substance for a biological cell) are simulated by the Monte Carlo track structure simulation code PARTRAC, using new inelastic electron scattering cross sections for condensed water. Every photon and electron emitted was followed in detail, event by event, down to 10 eV. From the spatial information on the track structures, absorbed dose distributions per (131)I and (125)I decay were calculated in and around water spheres simulating micrometastases as well as in the tissue surrounding such metastases. These radionuclides were assumed to be distributed uniformly inside spheres of different diameters (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 mm). The respective electron degradation spectra, the nearest-neighbor distance distributions between inelastic events, and the distance distributions for all activations for both iodine radionuclides were calculated. The absorbed fractions of the initial electron energies, absorbed doses and energy depositions, and single-event distributions, F(1)(epsilon), inside the six water spheres described above and in the surrounding tissue were also calculated. The absorbed doses per decay inside the six water spheres, i.e., the calculated S values (listed from 0.01 to 3.0 mm), were 6.8 x 10(-4), 7.2 x 10(-5), 5.5 x 10(-6), 4.9 x 10(-7), 3.1 x 10(-8) and 1.8 x 10(-9) Gy Bq(-1) s(-1) for (131)I, and 3.4 x 10(-3), 1.7 x 10(-4), 5.1 x 10(-6), 2.0 x 10(-7), 5.6 x 10(-9) and 2.2 x 10(-10) Gy Bq(-1) s(-1) for (125)I. It is concluded that, in the treatment of thyroid cancer, the geometrical track structure properties of (125)I might be superior to those of (131)I in micrometastases with diameters less than 0.1 mm; however, in this medical context, many other factors also have to be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11554854     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0419:tsaddf]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  5 in total

1.  Calculation of electron dose to target cells in a complex environment by Monte Carlo code "CELLDOSE".

Authors:  Elif Hindié; Christophe Champion; Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Domenico Rubello; Nicole Colas-Linhart; Laura Ravasi; Jean-Luc Moretti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  EURADOS strategic research agenda: vision for dosimetry of ionising radiation.

Authors:  W Rühm; E Fantuzzi; R Harrison; H Schuhmacher; F Vanhavere; J Alves; J F Bottollier Depois; P Fattibene; Ž Knežević; M A Lopez; S Mayer; S Miljanić; S Neumaier; P Olko; H Stadtmann; R Tanner; C Woda
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Modeling Cell and Tumor-Metastasis Dosimetry with the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport Code System (PHITS) Software for Targeted Alpha-Particle Radionuclide Therapy.

Authors:  Dongyoul Lee; Mengshi Li; Bryan Bednarz; Michael K Schultz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Electron emission from amorphous solid water induced by passage of energetic protons and fluorine ions.

Authors:  L H Toburen; S L McLawhorn; R A McLawhorn; K D Carnes; M Dingfelder; J L Shinpaugh
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Simulation of (125)I decay in a synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide with normal and distorted geometry and the role of radiation and non-radiation actions.

Authors:  Wei Bo Li; Werner Friedland; Peter Jacob; Igor G Panyutin; Herwig G Paretzke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 1.925

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.