Literature DB >> 11553900

Laser resurfacing with a long pulse erbium:YAG laser compared to the 950 ms pulsed CO(2) laser.

E F Rostan1, R E Fitzpatrick, M P Goldman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Laser resurfacing with the 950 micros pulsed CO(2) laser is an effective treatment for photodamage and acne scarring; however, the potential for prolonged erythema and delayed re-epithelialization dissuade many patients from the procedure. With the use of erbium lasers alone, there is a decrease in the incidence and severity of these adverse sequelae; however, it is difficult to achieve the same degree of improvement as with the CO(2) laser because of the more superficial depth of resurfacing. Thus, new erbium lasers have been developed with longer pulse durations to deliver increased thermal effects to tissue. It is hypothesized that with the use of these lasers, diminished erythema and faster wound healing will be observed as well as enhanced clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients were randomized to receive laser resurfacing on one-half of the face with the 950 micros pulsed CO(2) laser (UPCO(2)) followed by short pulse erbium:YAG ablation, and to the other half with a variable pulsed erbium laser (VP Er:YAG) followed by traditional short pulse erbium laser. Patients were evaluated clinically before resurfacing and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-operatively. Histologic samples taken at various time periods before and after resurfacing were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Overall clinical improvement was equal for both UPCO(2) and VP Er:YAG treated sides with an average improvement in photoaging scores of 57%. Decreased erythema, less edema, and faster healing were observed on the VP Er:YAG treated side.
CONCLUSION: The VP Er:YAG laser can achieve a similar degree of improvement as seen with short pulse CO(2) laser resurfacing with decreased thermal tissue effects and decreased risk for adverse sequelae. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11553900     DOI: 10.1002/lsm.1099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Laser treatment of wrinkles. Update].

Authors:  Claudia Borelli
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for photodamaged skin.

Authors:  Miny Samuel; Rebecca Brooke; Sally Hollis; Christopher E M Griffiths
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-02

3.  Effects of the 532-nm and 1,064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers on collagen turnover of cultured human skin fibroblasts: a comparative study.

Authors:  Yongyan Dang; Xiyun Ye; Yujing Weng; Zhi Tong; Qiushi Ren
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  The role of lasers and intense pulsed light technology in dermatology.

Authors:  Zain Husain; Tina S Alster
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2016-02-04

5.  Helium Plasma Dermal Resurfacing With and Without Concurrent Aesthetic Surgery of the Face and Neck: A Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Joseph B DeLozier; J David Holcomb
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2022-07-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.