Literature DB >> 11552781

Pneumatic lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of ureteral calculi.

Y Sun1, L Wang, G Liao, C Xu, X Gao, Q Yang, S Qian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and features of pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) with those of laser lithotripsy (LL) and present our clinical experience in the endoscopic management of ureteral calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1994 to February 2000, 285 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic lithotripsy with either the Swiss Lithoclast pneumatic lithotripter (145 patients) or the Ho:YAG laser lithotripter (140 patients) for the treatment of ureteral calculi.
RESULTS: In one single session, the overall successful stone fragmentation rate of LL was higher than that of PL (95.7% v 69.7%; P < 0.01). The average time to stone-free status was shorter for LL than for PL (18 days v 31 days; P < 0.01). No major complications were observed in LL, while five ureteral perforations were encountered in PL.
CONCLUSIONS: Laser lithotripsy has advantages over PL in high efficiency of stone fragmentation and a low complication rate. Laser lithotripsy is a powerful, effective, and safe treatment modality for ureteral calculi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11552781     DOI: 10.1089/089277901750426346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

1.  [The frequency-doubled double-pulse Neodym:YAG laser lithotripter (FREDDY) in lithotripsy of urinary stones. First clinical experience].

Authors:  A Ebert; J Stangl; R Kühn; W Schafhauser
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Simultaneous saline irrigation during retrograde rigid ureteroscopic lasertripsy for the prevention of proximal calculus migration.

Authors:  Lu Sun; Fang-Li Peng
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  A comparison of efficacies of holmium YAG laser, and pneumatic lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones.

Authors:  Ekrem Akdeniz; Lokman İrkılata; Hüseyin Cihan Demirel; Acun Saylık; Mustafa Suat Bolat; Necmettin Şahinkaya; Mehmet Zengin; Mustafa Kemal Atilla
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-09

4.  Comparison of Stone Retrieval Basket, Stone Cone and Holmium Laser: Which One Is Better in Retropulsion and Stone-Free Status for Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi?

Authors:  Farzad Allameh; Mohammadreza Razzaghi; Morteza Fallah-Karkan; Behnam Hosseini; Ali Tayyebi Azar; Arash Ranjbar; Amir Hossein Rahavian; Saleh Ghiasy
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-06

5.  Use of XenX™, the latest ureteric occlusion device with guide wire utility: results from a prospective multicentric comparative study.

Authors:  Francesco Sanguedolce; Emanuele Montanari; Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Nicola Macchione; Stephan Hruby; Athanasios Papatsoris; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Luca Villa; Patrick Honeck; Olivier Traxer; Francesco Greco
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Use of NTrap® during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Upper Ureteral Stones.

Authors:  Moung Jin Lee; Seung Tae Lee; Seung Ki Min
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

7.  Treatment of ureteral stones: A prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Robab Maghsoudi; Mohsen Amjadi; Davood Norizadeh; Hassan Hassanzadeh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.