Literature DB >> 11552129

Sex differences in mandibular movements during opening and closing.

R P Lewis1, P H Buschang, G S Throckmorton.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the sex differences in maximum 3-dimensional opening and closing movements. The sample included 29 men (ages, 23-39 years) and 27 women (ages, 23-35 years), who were selected for normal Class I occlusion, temporomandibular function, and skeletal patterns. Condylar (hinge axis) translation and mandibular incisor movements, were recorded with an optoelectric jaw-tracking system; each participant performed 4 maximum opening/closing cycles. The results showed significant (P <.05) sex differences for incisor opening and closing movements, with most of the differences in the vertical component. Male incisor straight-line distances and curvilinear pathways averaged 52.1 mm and 54.8 mm, respectively. Female straight-line distances and curvilinear pathways averaged 46.0 mm and 48.1 mm, respectively. There were significant (P <.05) sex differences for condylar translation, with most of the differences in the anteroposterior component. Male condyles translated 15.4 to 17.6 mm (straight-line distances) and 20.5 to 20.7 mm (curvilinear pathways); female condyles translated 12.4 to 12.7 mm (straight-line distances) and 16.2 to 17.9 mm (curvilinear pathways). Mandibular length accounted for some of the sex difference in interincisal opening and for most of the sex differences in condylar translation. Closing movements showed the same pattern of sex differences as opening movements. Mandibular opening rotation was approximately 4 degrees larger in men than in women. The shapes of the condylar opening and closing pathways also differed significantly between men and women. For both sexes, condylar translation did not correlate with incisor opening or closing movements. It was concluded that (1) significant sex differences exist in incisor opening movements that are independent of mandibular size, (2) sex differences in condylar translation are dependent on mandibular size, (3) incisor opening movements should not be used as an indicator of condylar translation, and (4) sex differences in the shapes of the condylar pathways indicate sex differences in articular eminence morphologic features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11552129     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.115612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Radiological examination of the articular eminence morphology using cone beam CT.

Authors:  M A Sümbüllü; F Cağlayan; H M Akgül; A B Yilmaz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Mandibular kinematics and maximum voluntary bite force following segmental resection of the mandible without or with reconstruction.

Authors:  Sabine S Linsen; Annina Oikonomou; Markus Martini; Marcus Teschke
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  MRI findings in patients with severe trismus following radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Kunwar S S Bhatia; Ann D King; Bhawan K Paunipagar; Jill Abrigo; Alexander C Vlantis; Sing F Leung; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Assessing the mobility of the mandibular condyle by sonography.

Authors:  Han-Yu Chen; Shyi-Kuen Wu; Chuan-Chin Lu; Jia-Yuan You; Chung-Liang Lai
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Electromyographic activity of the jaw muscles and mandibular kinematics in young adults with theoretically ideal dental occlusion: Reference values.

Authors:  B Campillo; C Martín; J-C Palma; A-D Fuentes; J-A Alarcón
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-05-01

Review 6.  Efficacy of Kinematic Parameters for Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Function and Disfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Scolaro; Shahnawaz Khijmatgar; Pooja Mali Rai; Francesca Falsarone; Francesca Alicchio; Arianna Mosca; Christian Greco; Massimo Del Fabbro; Gianluca Martino Tartaglia
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22

7.  Vertical Mandibular Range of Motion in Anesthetized Dogs and Cats.

Authors:  Margherita Gracis; Eric Zini
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-06-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.