Literature DB >> 11551992

Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes.

P C Wainwright1, L A Ferry-Graham, T B Waltzek, A M Carroll, C D Hulsey, J R Grubich.   

Abstract

We characterized prey-capture strategies in seven species of cichlid fishes representing diverse trophic habits and anticipated feeding abilities. The species examined were Petenia splendida, Cichla ocellaris, Cichlasoma minckleyi, Astronotus ocellatus, Crenicichla geayi, Heros severus (formerly Cichlasoma severum) and Cyprichromis leptosoma. Three individuals per species were filmed with video at 500 Hz as they captured live adult Artemia sp. and Poecilia reticulata. For each feeding sequence, we measured the contribution of predator movement towards the prey (i.e. ram) and the movement of prey towards the predator due to suction. The use of ram differed significantly among prey types and predator species, varying as much as sixfold across predator species. High values of ram resulted in high attack velocities. Jaw protrusion contributed as much as 50% to overall ram values in some species, verifying its role in enhancing attack velocity. Suction distance did not vary significantly among species. Diversity in prey-capture behavior was therefore found to reflect differences among species in the strategy used to approach prey. Limited variation in the distance from which prey were sucked into the mouth is interpreted as the result of an expected exponential decline in water velocity with distance from the mouth of the suction-feeding predator. We propose that this relationship represents a major constraint on the distance over which suction feeding is effective for all aquatic-feeding predators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11551992     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.17.3039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  19 in total

1.  Biomechanical trade-offs bias rates of evolution in the feeding apparatus of fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; David C Collar; Samantha A Price; C Darrin Hulsey; Robert C Thomson; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A faster escape does not enhance survival in zebrafish larvae.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Christy Nguyen; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The forces exerted by aquatic suction feeders on their prey.

Authors:  Peter C Wainwright; Steven W Day
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Jaw protrusion enhances forces exerted on prey by suction feeding fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; Steven W Day; Rita S Mehta; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  When Optimal Strategy Matters to Prey Fish.

Authors:  Alberto Soto; William J Stewart; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  Modelled three-dimensional suction accuracy predicts prey capture success in three species of centrarchid fishes.

Authors:  Emily A Kane; Timothy E Higham
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Aquatic feeding in pipid frogs: the use of suction for prey capture.

Authors:  Carrie A Carreño; Kiisa C Nishikawa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Larval zebrafish rapidly sense the water flow of a predator's strike.

Authors:  M J McHenry; K E Feitl; J A Strother; W J Van Trump
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Relative importance of growth and behaviour to elasmobranch suction-feeding performance over early ontogeny.

Authors:  Dayv Lowry; Philip J Motta
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.