Literature DB >> 1155122

Characterization of Micrococcaceae from the urinary tract.

A Digranes, P Oeding.   

Abstract

Two hundred and seven urinary strains of staphylococci and micrococci were classified biochemically according to Baird-Parker (1963) and by means of a simplified schema. One hundred and thirteen strains belonged to Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermids or S. saprophyticus (64 strains) according to the simplified schema, respectively to Baird-Parker's sub-groups SI, SII or M3. S. saprophyticus was isolated from young, female out-patients, was relatively resistant to novobiocin and contained poly AbetaC (beta-N-acetylglucosaminyl ribitol teichoic acid and beta-N-acetylglucosaminyl glycerol teichoic acid). S. aureus and S. epidermidis were isolated from older, male in-patients, were sensitive to novobiocin and contained poly A (N-acetylglucosaminyl ribitol teichoic acid), respectively poly B (glucosyl glycerol teichoic acid). Ninety-four strains belonging to other Staphylococcus or Micrococcus subgroups could not be classified by the simplified schema. With few exceptions, these strains were sensitive to novobiocin and either gave a precipitin reaction corresponding to poly C or were non-typable with the teichoic acid reference systems used. The simplified schema is recommended for the classification of coagulase-negative strains of Micrococcaceae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1155122     DOI: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1975.tb00115.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B        ISSN: 0105-0656


  10 in total

1.  Taxonomy of coagulase-negative staphylococci: a comparison of two widely used classification schemes.

Authors:  F Namavar; J de Graaff; D M MacLaren
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.271

2.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus saprophyticus and urethral staphylococci.

Authors:  T J Marrie; C Kwan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Nuclease of staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from mastitic milk. Production and some properties.

Authors:  R Gudding
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Comparison of methods for identifying Staphylococcus and Micrococcus spp.

Authors:  B A Gunn; F L Singleton; E R Peele; R R Colwell; J K Keiser; C O Kapper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clinical distribution and antibiotic sensitivities of staphylococcal strains isolated over an eight-month period.

Authors:  P E Varaldo; O Soro; G Grazi; F Biavasco
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Comparison of various methods for differentiation of staphylococci and micrococci.

Authors:  J S Baker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci from urinary tract isolates.

Authors:  J F John; P K Gramling; N M O'Dell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid distinction between micrococci and staphylococci with furazolidone agars.

Authors:  K E von Rheinbaben; R M Hadlok
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.271

9.  Urinary tract infections due to Staphylococcus saprophyticus biotype 3.

Authors:  J D Anderson; A M Clarke; M E Anderson; J L Isaac-Renton; M G McLoughlin
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Staphylococcus saprophyticus as a cause of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  T J Marrie; C Kwan; M A Noble; A West; L Duffield
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.948

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.