Literature DB >> 11550913

Putting background information about relative risks into conjugate prior distributions.

S Greenland1.   

Abstract

In Bayesian and empirical Bayes analyses of epidemiologic data, the most easily implemented prior specifications use a multivariate normal distribution for the log relative risks or a conjugate distribution for the discrete response vector. This article describes problems in translating background information about relative risks into conjugate priors and a solution. Traditionally, conjugate priors have been specified through flattening constants, an approach that leads to conflicts with the true prior covariance structure for the log relative risks. One can, however, derive a conjugate prior consistent with that structure by using a data-augmentation approximation to the true log relative-risk prior, although a rescaling step is needed to ensure the accuracy of the approximation. These points are illustrated with a logistic regression analysis of neonatal-death risk.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11550913     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00663.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Bayesian bias adjustments of the lung cancer SMR in a cohort of German carbon black production workers.

Authors:  Peter Morfeld; Robert J McCunney
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.646

2.  Methodological issues in the design and analyses of neonatal research studies: Experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network.

Authors:  Abhik Das; Jon Tyson; Claudia Pedroza; Barbara Schmidt; Marie Gantz; Dennis Wallace; William E Truog; Rosemary D Higgins
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Incorporating prior biologic information for high-dimensional rare variant association studies.

Authors:  Melanie A Quintana; Fredrick R Schumacher; Graham Casey; Jonine L Bernstein; Li Li; David V Conti
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 0.444

4.  Sensitivity analyses for sparse-data problems-using weakly informative bayesian priors.

Authors:  Ghassan B Hamra; Richard F MacLehose; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Estimating relative risks in multicenter studies with a small number of centers - which methods to use? A simulation study.

Authors:  Claudia Pedroza; Van Thi Thanh Truong
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Advantages of Bayesian monitoring methods in deciding whether and when to stop a clinical trial: an example of a neonatal cooling trial.

Authors:  Claudia Pedroza; Jon E Tyson; Abhik Das; Abbot Laptook; Edward F Bell; Seetha Shankaran
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.