Literature DB >> 11550895

Specific genetic markers for wheat, spelt, and four wild relatives: comparison of isozymes, RAPDs, and wheat microsatellites.

R Guadagnuolo1, D S Bianchi, F Felber.   

Abstract

Three types of markers-isozymes, RAPDs (random amplified polymorphic DNAs), and wheat microsatellites- were tested on wheat, spelt, and four wild wheat relatives (Aegilops cylindrica, Elymus caninus, Hordeum marinum, and Agropyron junceum). The aim was to evaluate their capability to provide specific markers for differentiation of the cultivated and wild species. The markers were set up for subsequent detection of hybrids and introgression of wheat DNA into wild relatives. All markers allowed differentiation of the cultivated from the wild species. Wheat microsatellites were not amplified in all the wild relatives, whereas RAPDs and isozymes exhibited polymorphism for all species. The dendrograms obtained with RAPD and isozyme data separated Swiss wheat cultivars from those collected in Austria and England, while no difference was found between Swiss spelt and wheat. RAPD data provided a weak discrimination between English and Austrian E. caninus. The microsatellite-based dendrogram discriminated populations of Ae. cylindrica, but no clear separation of H. marinum from E. caninus was revealed. The similarity matrices based on the three different sets of data were strongly correlated. The highest value was recorded between the matrices based on RAPDs and isozymes (Mantel's test, r = 0.93). Correlations between the similarity matrix based on microsatellites and matrices based on RAPDs and isozymes were lower: 0.74 and 0.68, respectively. While microsatellites are very useful for comparisons of closely related accessions, they are less suitable for studies involving less-related taxa. Isozymes provide interesting markers for species differentiation, but their use seems less appropriate for studies of within-species genetic variation. RAPDs can produce a large set of markers, which can be used for the evaluation of both between- and within-species genetic variation, more rapidly and easily than isozymes and microsatellites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11550895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome        ISSN: 0831-2796            Impact factor:   2.166


  7 in total

1.  Molecular marker-based genetic diversity assessment of Striga-resistant maize inbred lines.

Authors:  A Menkir; J G Kling; B Badu-Apraku; I Ingelbrecht
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-03-05       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity and population genetic structure of a wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) in China.

Authors:  Hai-Fei Zhou; Zhong-Wen Xie; Song Ge
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Molecular diversity in French bread wheat accessions related to temporal trends and breeding programmes.

Authors:  V Roussel; J Koenig; M Beckert; F Balfourier
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  ISSR-based clustering of cultivated flax germplasm is statistically correlated to thousand seed mass.

Authors:  D Wiesnerová; I Wiesner
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Analysis of the Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Austrian and Belgian Wheat Germplasm within a Regional Context Based on DArT Markers.

Authors:  Mohamed A El-Esawi; Jacques Witczak; Abd El-Fatah Abomohra; Hayssam M Ali; Mohamed S Elshikh; Margaret Ahmad
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Development of microsatellite markers from an enriched genomic library for genetic analysis of melon (Cucumis melo L.).

Authors:  Patricia Silva Ritschel; Tulio Cesar de Lima Lins; Rodrigo Lourenço Tristan; Gláucia Salles Cortopassi Buso; José Amauri Buso; Márcio Elias Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Unique Genotypic Differences Discovered among Indigenous Bangladeshi Rice Landraces.

Authors:  Nusrat Yesmin; Sabrina M Elias; Md Sazzadur Rahman; Taslima Haque; A K M Mahbub Hasan; Zeba I Seraj
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 2.326

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.