Literature DB >> 11550730

Shaping cocaine abstinence by successive approximation.

K L Preston1, A Umbricht, C J Wong, D H Epstein.   

Abstract

Cocaine-using methadone-maintenance patients were randomized to standard contingency management (abstinence group, n = 49) or to a contingency designed to increase contact with reinforcers (shaping group, n = 46). For 8 weeks, both groups earned escalating-value vouchers based on thrice-weekly urinalyses: The abstinence group earned vouchers for cocaine-negative urines only; the shaping group earned vouchers for each urine specimen with a 25% or more decrease in cocaine metabolite (first 3 weeks) and then for negative urines only (last 5 weeks). Cocaine use was lower in the shaping group, but only in the last 5 weeks, when the response requirement was identical. Thus, the shaping contingency appeared to better prepare patients for abstinence. A 2nd phase of the study showed that abstinence induced by escalating-value vouchers can be maintained by a nonescalating schedule, suggesting that contingency management can be practical as a maintenance treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11550730     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.69.4.643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  26 in total

1.  Cognitive-behavioral therapy plus contingency management for cocaine use: findings during treatment and across 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  David H Epstein; Wesley E Hawkins; Lino Covi; Annie Umbricht; Kenzie L Preston
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  A developmental perspective on neuroeconomic mechanisms of contingency management.

Authors:  Catherine Stanger; Alan J Budney; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-06-04

3.  A placebo-controlled trial of memantine for cocaine dependence with high-value voucher incentives during a pre-randomization lead-in period.

Authors:  Adam Bisaga; Efrat Aharonovich; Wendy Y Cheng; Frances R Levin; John J Mariani; Wilfrid N Raby; Edward V Nunes
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Exploring the limits and utility of operant conditioning in the treatment of drug addiction.

Authors:  Kenneth Silverman
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2004

5.  Randomized trial of prize-based reinforcement density for simultaneous abstinence from cocaine and heroin.

Authors:  Udi E Ghitza; David H Epstein; John Schmittner; Massoud Vahabzadeh; Jia-Ling Lin; Kenzie L Preston
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-10

6.  Effect of reinforcement probability and prize size on cocaine and heroin abstinence in prize-based contingency management.

Authors:  Udi E Ghitza; David H Epstein; John Schmittner; Massoud Vahabzadeh; Jia-Ling Lin; Kenzie L Preston
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

7.  Alternative reinforcer response cost impacts cocaine choice in humans.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; Paul E A Glaser; Lon R Hays; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.067

8.  The effects of percentile versus fixed criterion schedules on smoking with equal incentive magnitude for initial abstinence.

Authors:  Paul Romanowich; R J Lamb
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Comparable efficacy of contingency management for cocaine dependence among African American, Hispanic, and White methadone maintenance clients.

Authors:  Danielle Barry; Brendan Sullivan; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2009-03

10.  Effects of oral methamphetamine on cocaine use: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Marc E Mooney; David V Herin; Joy M Schmitz; Nidal Moukaddam; Charles E Green; John Grabowski
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.