Literature DB >> 11549532

Inhaled formoterol dry powder versus ipratropium bromide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

R Dahl1, L A Greefhorst, D Nowak, V Nonikov, A M Byrne, M H Thomson, D Till, G Della Cioppa.   

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of inhaled formoterol with that of ipratropium in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). After a 2-wk run-in period, 780 patients with COPD were randomized to receive for 12 wk formoterol dry powder 12 or 24 microg twice daily, ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily, or placebo in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) measured over 12 h after 12 wk of treatment. Secondary variables included diary symptoms and quality of life. Both doses of formoterol and ipratropium significantly increased the area under the curve for FEV(1) in comparison with placebo (all p < 0.001). Both doses of formoterol were also significantly superior to ipratropium (all p < 0.025). Compared with placebo, both doses of formoterol significantly improved symptoms (all p < or = 0.007) and quality of life (p < 0.01 for total scores) whereas ipratropium did not show significant effects (all p > or = 0.3). All study treatments exhibited a similar safety profile. We conclude that formoterol is more effective than ipratropium bromide in the treatment of COPD, as the efficacy of ipratropium on airflow obstruction does not translate into a clinical benefit that patients can perceive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11549532     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2007006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  72 in total

1.  The role of indacaterol for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Authors:  Mario Cazzola; Floriana Bardaro; Emanuele Stirpe
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  [New therapeutic approaches to COPD].

Authors:  M Pfeifer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  COPD exacerbations. 4: Prevention.

Authors:  S Scott; P Walker; P M A Calverley
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations.

Authors:  Dheeraj Gupta; Ritesh Agarwal; Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal; V N Maturu; Sahajal Dhooria; K T Prasad; Inderpaul S Sehgal; Lakshmikant B Yenge; Aditya Jindal; Navneet Singh; A G Ghoshal; G C Khilnani; J K Samaria; S N Gaur; D Behera
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2013-07

Review 5.  Cardiovascular safety of beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist use in patients with obstructive airway disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shelley R Salpeter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an update of treatment related to frequently associated comorbidities.

Authors:  Nicola J Sinden; Robert A Stockley
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 7.  Differential assessment and management of asthma vs chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Barbara P Yawn
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2009-01-21

Review 8.  Optimizing bronchodilator therapy in emphysema.

Authors:  Philip T Diaz; Aaron S Bruns; Michael E Ezzie; Nathaniel Marchetti; Byron M Thomashow
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01

Review 9.  The pharmacological approach to the elderly COPD patient.

Authors:  Timothy E Albertson; Michael Schivo; Amir A Zeki; Samuel Louie; Mark E Sutter; Mark Avdalovic; Andrew L Chan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Healthcare costs with tiotropium plus usual care versus usual care alone following 1 year of treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD).

Authors:  Mitchell Friedman; Shailendra S Menjoge; Susan F Anton; Steven Kesten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.