Literature DB >> 11549303

Comparison of the heparin coated vs the uncoated Jostent--no influence on restenosis or clinical outcome.

J Wöhrle1, E Al-Khayer, U Grötzinger, C Schindler, M Kochs, V Hombach, M Höher.   

Abstract

AIMS: Heparin coating of stents is thought to reduce stent thrombosis and restenosis rates. However, clinical data comparing coated and uncoated stents of the same model are lacking. We compared the heparin coated (C) and the uncoated (U) version of the Jostent stent with regard to the clinical and angiographic outcome after 6 months. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Provisional stenting was done in 277 patients and 306 lesions; only 40 were Benestent-II like lesions. Delivery success rate was 98.4%. Both groups (C/U: n=156/150 lesions) were comparable in clinical and procedural data. Post stenting, reference diameter (C/U: 2.68+/-0.56/2.66+/-0.53 mm) and minimal lumen diameter did not differ (C/U: 2.48+/-0.47/2.48+/-0.52 mm). During follow-up the rate of subacute stent thrombosis (C/U: 1.9%/1.3%) and myocardial infarction did not differ. Angiography at the 6-month follow-up (79.4%) revealed no difference in restenosis rate (C/U: 33.1%/30.3%). Risk factors for restenosis were a type B2/C lesion (P<0.02), a stented segment longer than 16 mm (P<0.006) and a stent inflation pressure <14 bar (P<0.0063).
CONCLUSION: Corline heparin coating of the Jostent has no impact on the in-hospital complication rate, stent thrombosis or restenosis. The Jostent design gives a high procedural success rate and satisfying result at 6 months in an everyday patient population undergoing provisional stenting. Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11549303     DOI: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  8 in total

Review 1.  Coronary stents: in these days of climate change should all stents wear coats?

Authors:  R Lowe; I B A Menown; G Nogareda; I M Penn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  c-Jun regulates shear- and injury-inducible Egr-1 expression, vein graft stenosis after autologous end-to-side transplantation in rabbits, and intimal hyperplasia in human saphenous veins.

Authors:  Jun Ni; Alla Waldman; Levon M Khachigian
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Delivery of large biopharmaceuticals from cardiovascular stents: a review.

Authors:  Hironobu Takahashi; Didier Letourneur; David W Grainger
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 4.  Drug-eluting stents: the past, present, and future.

Authors:  Gregory Katz; Bhisham Harchandani; Binita Shah
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 5.  Anti-fouling strategies for central venous catheters.

Authors:  Alex Wallace; Hassan Albadawi; Nikasha Patel; Ali Khademhosseini; Yu Shrike Zhang; Sailendra Naidu; Grace Knuttinen; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12

Review 6.  Biocompatibility of Coronary Stents.

Authors:  Thamarasee M Jeewandara; Steven G Wise; Martin K C Ng
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Anti-inflammatory effect of abciximab-coated stent in a porcine coronary restenosis model.

Authors:  Young Joon Hong; Myung Ho Jeong; Sang Rok Lee; Seo Na Hong; Kye Hun Kim; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Weon Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park; Jung Chaee Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Thrombogenic and Inflammatory Reactions to Biomaterials in Medical Devices.

Authors:  Carlos A Labarrere; Ali E Dabiri; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.