Literature DB >> 11549028

Evaluation of nitric oxide production by lactobacilli.

J Xu1, W Verstraete.   

Abstract

Six strains of Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus plantarum were investigated for nitric oxide (NO) production. First, the potential presence of NO synthase was examined. None of the strains of L. fermentum and L. plantarum examined produced NO from L-arginine under aerobic conditions. Interestingly, all L. fermentum strains expressed strong L-arginine deiminase activity. All L. fermentum strains produced NO in MRS broth, but the NO was found to be chemically derived from nitrite, which was produced by L. fermentum from nitrate present in the medium. Indeed all L. fermentum strains express nitrate reductase under anaerobic conditions. Moreover, one strain, L. fermentum LF1, had nitrate reductase activity under aerobic conditions. It was also found that L. fermentum strains JCM1173 and LF1 possessed ammonifying nitrite reductase. The latter strain also had denitrifying nitrite reductase activity at neutral pH under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions. The LF1 strain is thus capable of biochemically converting nitrate to NO. NO and nitrite produced from nitrate by lactobacilli may constitute a potential antimicrobial mechanism. studied in a rat acute liver injury model (Adawi et al. 1997). The results indicate that Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 9842 may possess NOS (Adawi et al. 1997). However, NO production from L-arginine has not been investigated in pure cultures of L. plantarum. According to the results of a 15N enrichment experiment, traces of (NO2-+NO3-)-N (total oxidised nitrogen: TON), which seemed to be formed by the resting cells of Lactobacillus fermentum IFO3956, appeared to be derived from L-arginine (Morita et al. 1997). Therefore, it was suggested that L. fermentum may possess a NOS. However, NO produced from L-arginine was not directly measured and a NOS inhibitor test was not performed by Morita et al. (1997). It is known that L-arginine deiminase (ADI) in bacteria may convert L-arginine to NH4+ (Cunin et al. 1986), which may be further oxidised to TON via nitrification by bacteria. Therefore, 15N enrichment experiments could not definitely conclude that L. fermentum possess NOS to convert L-arginine directly to NO. In this study, six Lactobacillus strains belonging to L. plantarum and L. fermentum were measured for NO production in MRS broth. The metabolism of nitrate and L-arginine by the Lactobacillus cell suspensions was also studied. The possibility that NO and nitrite production by lactobacilli may be a potential probiotic trait is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11549028     DOI: 10.1007/s002530100616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  16 in total

1.  HcpR of Porphyromonas gingivalis is required for growth under nitrosative stress and survival within host cells.

Authors:  Janina P Lewis; Sai S Yanamandra; Cecilia Anaya-Bergman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  GAS6 is a key homeostatic immunological regulator of host-commensal interactions in the oral mucosa.

Authors:  Maria Nassar; Yaara Tabib; Tal Capucha; Gabriel Mizraji; Tsipora Nir; Meirav Pevsner-Fischer; Gili Zilberman-Schapira; Oded Heyman; Gabriel Nussbaum; Herve Bercovier; Asaf Wilensky; Eran Elinav; Tal Burstyn-Cohen; Avi-Hai Hovav
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coagulase-negative Staphylococci favor conversion of arginine into ornithine despite a widespread genetic potential for nitric oxide synthase activity.

Authors:  María Sánchez Mainar; Stefan Weckx; Frédéric Leroy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effect of pH on an in vitro model of gastric microbiota in enteral nutrition patients.

Authors:  Graeme A O'May; Nigel Reynolds; George T Macfarlane
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Biodiversity of Intestinal Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Healthy Population.

Authors:  Marika Mikelsaar; Epp Sepp; Jelena Štšepetova; Epp Songisepp; Reet Mändar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Fzf1p regulates an inducible response to nitrosative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Aaron Sarver; Joseph DeRisi
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 7.  Defenses against oxidative stress in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a system tailored for a challenging environment.

Authors:  Kate L Seib; Hsing-Ju Wu; Stephen P Kidd; Michael A Apicella; Michael P Jennings; Alastair G McEwan
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 8.  Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice.

Authors:  Gregor Reid; Jana Jass; M Tom Sebulsky; John K McCormick
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 9.  Comparison of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria effects, immune responses and rotavirus vaccines and infection in different host species.

Authors:  Anastasia N Vlasova; Sukumar Kandasamy; Kuldeep S Chattha; Gireesh Rajashekara; Linda J Saif
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.046

10.  Differential inflammatory mediator response in vitro from murine macrophages to lactobacilli and pathogenic intestinal bacteria.

Authors:  J Marcinkiewicz; M Ciszek; M Bobek; M Strus; P B Heczko; M Kurnyta; R Biedroń; A Chmielarczyk
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.