Literature DB >> 11548034

Shared attentional resources for processing visual and chemosensory information.

C Spence1, B Kettenmann, G Kobal, F P McGlone.   

Abstract

For many years, researchers have argued that we have separate attentional resources for the processing of information impinging on each of our sensory receptor systems. However, a number of recent studies have demonstrated the existence of shared attentional resources for the processing of auditory, visual and tactile stimuli. In the present study, we examined whether there are also common attentional resources for the processing of chemosensory stimuli. Participants made speeded (left vs. right) footpedal discrimination responses to an unpredictable sequence of visual and chemosensory stimuli presented to either nostril. The participants' attention was directed to one or the other modality by means of a symbolic auditory cue (high or low tone) at the start of each trial, which predicted the likely modality for the upcoming target on the majority (80%) of trials. Participants responded more rapidly when the target occurred in the expected modality than when it occurred in the unexpected modality, implying the existence of shared attentional resources for the processing of chemosensory and visual stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11548034     DOI: 10.1080/713755985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  7 in total

1.  Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The source of dual-task limitations: serial or parallel processing of multiple response selections?

Authors:  Suk Won Han; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Attention and olfactory consciousness.

Authors:  Andreas Keller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-16

4.  The Olfactory System Revealed: Non-Invasive Mapping by using Constrained Spherical Deconvolution Tractography in Healthy Humans.

Authors:  Demetrio Milardi; Alberto Cacciola; Alessandro Calamuneri; Maria F Ghilardi; Fabrizia Caminiti; Filippo Cascio; Veronica Andronaco; Giuseppe Anastasi; Enricomaria Mormina; Alessandro Arrigo; Daniele Bruschetta; Angelo Quartarone
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.856

5.  Attentional modulation of desensitization to odor.

Authors:  Nicholas Fallon; Timo Giesbrecht; Andrej Stancak
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Does Improved Attention Induced by Caffeine Intake Affect Olfactory Function?

Authors:  Kyujin Han; Jiyeon Lee; Bo Yoon Choi; Hamin Jeong; Jae Hoon Cho; Jin Kook Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Distinct olfactory cross-modal effects on the human motor system.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Alberto De Capua; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Monica Ulivelli; Luciano Fadiga; Vincenzo Falzarano; Sabina Bartalini; Stefano Passero; Daniele Nuti; Paolo M Rossini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.