Literature DB >> 11547850

Cleaning strategies for flux recovery of an ultrafiltration membrane fouled by natural organic matter.

H Lee1, G Amy, J Cho, Y Yoon, S H Moon, I S Kim.   

Abstract

One of the most common problems encountered in water treatment applications of membranes is fouling. Natural organic matter (NOM) represents a particularly problematic foulant. Membranes may be fouled by relatively hydrophilic and/or hydrophobic NOM components, depending on NOM characteristics, membrane properties, and operating conditions. To maximize flux recovery for an NOM-fouled ultrafiltration membrane (NTR 7410), chemical cleaning and hydraulic rinsing with a relatively high cross-flow velocity were investigated as cleaning strategies. The modification of the membrane surface with either an anionic or a cationic surfactant was also evaluated to minimize membrane fouling and to enhance NOM rejection. Foulants from a hydrophobic NOM source (Orange County ground water (OC-GW)) were cleaned more effectively in terms of permeate flux by acid and caustic cleanings than foulants from a relatively hydrophilic NOM source (Horsetooth surface water (HT-SW)). An anionic surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)) was not effective as a cleaning agent for foulants from either hydrophobic or hydrophilic NOM sources. High ionic strength cleaning with 0.1 M NaCl was comparatively effective in providing flux recovery for NOM-fouled membranes compared to other chemical cleaning agents. Increased cross-flow velocity and longer cleaning time influenced the efficiency of caustic cleaning, but not high ionic strength cleaning. The membrane was successfully modified only with the cationic surfactant; however, enhanced NOM rejection was accompanied by a significant flux reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547850     DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00063-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  Harvesting of Chlorella sp. using hollow fiber ultrafiltration.

Authors:  Cui Huang; Xiaolin Chen; Tianzhong Liu; Zhaohui Yang; Yong Xiao; Guangming Zeng; Xiuxuan Sun
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparative performance of flat sheet and spiral wound modules in the nanofiltration of reactive dye solution.

Authors:  Tejal M Patel; Harsh Chheda; Abhisek Baheti; Punit Patel; Kaushik Nath
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  UV and bacteriophages as a chemical-free approach for cleaning membranes from anaerobic bioreactors.

Authors:  Giantommaso Scarascia; Luca Fortunato; Yevhen Myshkevych; Hong Cheng; TorOve Leiknes; Pei-Ying Hong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  From cooperative to uncorrelated clogging in cross-flow microfluidic membranes.

Authors:  R van Zwieten; T van de Laar; J Sprakel; K Schroën
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Bacteriophage Infectivity Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Saline Conditions.

Authors:  Giantommaso Scarascia; Scott A Yap; Anna H Kaksonen; Pei-Ying Hong
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  A Review on the Use of Membrane Technology Systems in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Nur Hidayati Othman; Nur Hashimah Alias; Nurul Syazana Fuzil; Fauziah Marpani; Munawar Zaman Shahruddin; Chun Ming Chew; Kam Meng David Ng; Woei Jye Lau; Ahmad Fauzi Ismail
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.