Literature DB >> 11547507

Human gene patents: core issues in a multi-layered debate.

R Hoedemaekers1.   

Abstract

After ten years of debate Directive 98/44/EG on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions was adopted in 1998. This directive takes decisions on some controversial bioethical and legal issues and offers the European biotech industries more space to develop their inventions, but leaves a number of philosophical and moral issues unresolved. This paper distinguishes between different layers in the debate and maps its modes of argumentation. Major philosophical, ethical and conceptual issues are located. It is argued that further analysis of these issues can help resolve further ethical and legal difficulties as regards patenting of human DNA. As the allegedly special status of genetic material remains unclear, the status of (human) DNA and its relation to the human body and personal identity should be further explored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547507     DOI: 10.1023/a:1011432614563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  36 in total

1.  Property, progeny, and patents.

Authors:  L P Knowles
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Patenting the human genome.

Authors:  Reinhold C Salgo
Journal:  Bull Med Ethics       Date:  1997-01

3.  Disease genes are not patentable: a rebuttal of McGee.

Authors:  J F Merz; M K Cho
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  What's so special about the human genome?

Authors:  A L Caplan
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Patenting transgenics in the European Union.

Authors:  B Baggot
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Structure and function in gene patenting.

Authors:  R S Eisenberg
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Religious leaders oppose patenting genes and animals.

Authors:  R Stone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The case for genomic patenting.

Authors:  G Poste
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The concept of abnormality in medical genetics.

Authors:  R Hoedemaekers; H ten Have
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1999-12

10.  Commercialisation of genetic diagnostic services.

Authors:  R Hoedemaekers; H ten Have
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  1998
View more
  1 in total

1.  It's about scientific secrecy, dummy: a better equilibrium among genomics patenting, scientific research and health care.

Authors:  Miriam Bentwich
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.