Literature DB >> 11547298

Device-based change in left ventricular shape: a new concept for the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy.

P M McCarthy1, M Takagaki, Y Ochiai, J B Young, T Tabata, T Shiota, J X Qin, J D Thomas, T J Mortier, R F Schroeder, C J Schweich, K Fukamachi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We tested a unique new device, the Myosplint device (Myocor, Inc, Maple Grove, Minn), which is designed to change left ventricular shape, reduce left ventricular wall stress, and improve left ventricular systolic function.
METHODS: Heart failure was induced in 15 dogs over 27 days by rapid pacing (230 beats/min). Seven animals underwent sham surgery, and 8 animals received 3 transventricular Myosplint devices each. Myosplint devices were tightened to create a symmetric bilobular left ventricular shape and were adjusted to produce a calculated 20% reduction in wall stress. Hemodynamic, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional echocardiographic studies were recorded at baseline, immediately after Myosplint placement (acute change), and at 1 month after both groups had a reduced rate (190 beats/min) of pacing designed to maintain heart failure.
RESULTS: The Myosplint group had significant sustained improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline, to the acute change, to 1 month (19% +/- 5%; 36% +/- 8%; 39% +/- 13%) and reductions of left ventricular end-systolic volumes (73 +/- 9 mL; 34 +/- 5 mL; 42 +/- 12 mL) and end-systolic wall stress by 39% (341 +/- 68 10(3) dynes x cm(- 2) to 206 +/- 28 10(3) dynes x cm(-2)) acutely and 31% (372 +/- 83 10(3) dynes x cm(-2) to 250 +/- 40 10(3) dynes x cm(-2)) at 1 month. There were no significant changes in mitral regurgitation.
CONCLUSION: Application of a Myosplint device to a dilated impaired left ventricle resulted in reduced wall stress and improved left ventricular systolic function that was sustained at 1 month. Device-based shape change is a promising new opportunity to treat patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547298     DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2001.115240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  14 in total

Review 1.  New surgical treatments for heart failure.

Authors:  Mauricio J Garrido; Mehmet C Oz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Growth and remodeling of the left ventricle: A case study of myocardial infarction and surgical ventricular restoration.

Authors:  Doron Klepach; Lik Chuan Lee; Jonathan F Wenk; Mark B Ratcliffe; Tarek I Zohdi; Jose A Navia; Ghassan S Kassab; Ellen Kuhl; Julius M Guccione
Journal:  Mech Res Commun       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.254

Review 3.  Socks for the dilated heart. Does passive cardiomyoplasty have a role in long-term care for heart failure patients?

Authors:  J F Gummert; A Rahmel; T Bossert; F W Mohr
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-11

Review 4.  Surgical aspects of congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Daniel J Goldstein; Douglas Smego; Robert E Michler
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  Left ventricular restoration devices.

Authors:  Guilherme H Oliveira; Sadeer G Al-Kindi; Hiram G Bezerra; Marco A Costa
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Comparison of the Young-Laplace law and finite element based calculation of ventricular wall stress: implications for postinfarct and surgical ventricular remodeling.

Authors:  Zhihong Zhang; Amod Tendulkar; Kay Sun; David A Saloner; Arthur W Wallace; Liang Ge; Julius M Guccione; Mark B Ratcliffe
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Physiological Implications of Myocardial Scar Structure.

Authors:  William J Richardson; Samantha A Clarke; T Alexander Quinn; Jeffrey W Holmes
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 9.090

8.  Left ventricular hypertrophy patterns and incidence of heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Raghava S Velagaleti; Philimon Gona; Michael J Pencina; Jayashri Aragam; Thomas J Wang; Daniel Levy; Ralph B D'Agostino; Douglas S Lee; William B Kannel; Emelia J Benjamin; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  Nontransplant surgical options for congestive heart failure.

Authors:  J Ferrão de Oliveira; Manuel J Antunes
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Functional mitral regurgitation: a 30-year unresolved surgical journey from valve replacement to complex valve repairs.

Authors:  Francesco Onorati; Francesco Santini; Rajesh Dandale; Andrea Rossi; Esther Campopiano; Konstantinos Pechlivanidis; Daniele Calzaferri; Aldo Milano; Alessandro Mazzucco; Giuseppe Faggian
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.