Literature DB >> 11547212

A method to study lumbar spine response to axial compression during magnetic resonance imaging: technical note.

D Wisleder1, S L Werner, W J Kraemer, S J Fleck, V M Zatsiorsky.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible device was developed to apply calibrated compression loads to the lumbar spine during imaging. Experiments were performed to establish a protocol to measure lumbar load-response and estimate muscle-force contribution to spinal load.
OBJECTIVE: To develop experimental methodology for direct study of lumbar spine response to compression load. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most lumbar MRI scans require subjects to lie relaxed and supine, but spinal stenosis has been demonstrated to increase during moderate compressive loading. Several devices have been used to load the spine during MRI, but they could not maintain and/or change calibrated loads during MRI experiments. Furthermore, artifact from viscoelastic creep during imaging was not considered.
METHODS: An MRI-compatible spine compression unit with pneumatic load elements was developed to produce calibrated compression loads. Young healthy men were loaded with 140% body weight for up to 10 minutes to establish an appropriate test protocol. Muscle force contribution to spinal load was estimated from electromyography experiments.
RESULTS: The spine compression unit produced specified loads +/- 29 N (standard deviation). Spine viscoelastic creep reached steady state by 6.5 minutes, leaving 3.5 minutes for image acquisition. The subjects could support 1.0 body weight for the requisite 10 minutes. Muscle compressive force estimates were only 135 N during application of 1.4 x body weight external compression load; thus, internal muscle forces during supine spine compression could be neglected.
CONCLUSIONS: The lumbar load/image protocol fits within the time constraints of creep deformation and subject endurance. These methods allow acute lumbar mechanical response measurements during loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547212     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200109150-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  2 in total

1.  Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic-kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results.

Authors:  J Randy Jinkins; Jay S Dworkin; Raymond V Damadian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A fast, accurate, and reliable reconstruction method of the lumbar spine vertebrae using positional MRI.

Authors:  Craig J Simons; Loren Cobb; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.934

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.