Literature DB >> 11547204

Dynamic sagittal imbalance of the spine in degenerative flat back: significance of pelvic tilt in surgical treatment.

C S Lee1, C K Lee, Y T Kim, Y M Hong, J H Yoo.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study of 26 patients with degenerative flat back treated with corrective osteotomy.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze dynamic sagittal imbalance and to elucidate the cause of postoperative persistent stooping in degenerative flat back. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Sagittal spinal imbalance in degenerative flat back was more evident on walking, suggesting its dynamic nature. The most puzzling complication in its surgical treatment was postoperative persistent stooping.
METHODS: This study analyzed 26 surgically treated patients with preoperative gait analysis. Patients were divided into two groups according to postoperative improvement in stooping: Group 1 with marked improvement in stooping and Group 2 with persistent stooping. Various radiographic and gait parameters were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Comparison of radiographic parameters, representing the static status of the spine, did not indicate any clue to the mechanism for persistent stooping. However, comparison of gait parameters, representing the dynamic status of the spine, revealed meaningful differences between the two groups. Among various gait parameters compared, pelvic tilt seemed to be the most important clue. Patients in Group 1 showed posterior pelvic tilt, whereas those in Group 2 showed marked anterior pelvic tilt.
CONCLUSION: Degenerative flat back could be classified into two types based on pelvic position during walking: one with posterior pelvic tilt and the other with marked anterior pelvic tilt. In the former type, corrective surgery improved the stooping. In the latter, corrective surgery was ineffective, resulting in postoperative persistent stooping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547204     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200109150-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  Overcorrection of lumbar lordosis for adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance: comparison of radiographic outcomes between overcorrection and undercorrection.

Authors:  Jung-Hee Lee; Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Chung Kang; Hyun-Seok Oh; Young-Jun Kim; Hyuk Jung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic-kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results.

Authors:  J Randy Jinkins; Jay S Dworkin; Raymond V Damadian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP) publications.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-12

4.  Relationships between falls, spinal curvature, spinal mobility and back extensor strength in elderly people.

Authors:  Yuji Kasukawa; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Michio Hongo; Yoshinori Ishikawa; Hideaki Noguchi; Keiji Kamo; Hiroshi Sasaki; Katsuyuki Murata; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Dynamic global sagittal alignment evaluated by three-dimensional gait analysis in patients with degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis.

Authors:  Yo Shiba; Hiroshi Taneichi; Satoshi Inami; Hiroshi Moridaira; Daisaku Takeuchi; Yutaka Nohara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Analysis of an unexplored group of sagittal deformity patients: low pelvic tilt despite positive sagittal malalignment.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Ferrero; Shaleen Vira; Christopher P Ames; Khaled Kebaish; Ibrahim Obeid; Michael F O'Brien; Munish C Gupta; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Justin S Smith; Gregory M Mundis; Vincent Challier; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Sagittal balance of the spine.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; W Thompson; Y Mohsinaly; C Barrey; A Faundez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar degenerative kyphosis.

Authors:  Tae Sik Goh; Jong Ki Shin; Myung Soo Youn; Hong Seok Lee; Taek Hoon Kim; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Factors affecting clinical results after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis.

Authors:  Whoan Jeang Kim; Jong Won Kang; Sung Il Kang; Hwan Il Sung; Kun Young Park; Jae Guk Park; Won Cho Kwon; Won Sik Choy
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2010-04-26

10.  Circumferential thoracolumbar corrective fusion with an anterior interbody fresh-frozen femoral head allograft for osteoporotic lower acute kyphosis: a case report.

Authors:  Naohisa Miyakoshi; Eiji Abe; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.