D A Lawlor1, S Ebrahim, G Davey Smith. 1. Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR. D.A.Lawlor@bristol.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine secular trends and geographical variations in sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease and investigate how these relate to distributions in risk factors. DESIGN: National and international data were used to examine secular trends and geographical variations in sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease and risk factors. SETTING: England and Wales, 1921-98; Australia, France, Japan, Sweden, and the United States, 1947-97; 50 countries, 1992-6. DATA SOURCES: Office for National Statistics, World Health Organization, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. RESULTS: The 20th century epidemic of coronary heart disease affected only men in most industrialised countries and had a very rapid onset in England and Wales, which has been examined in detail. If this male only epidemic had not occurred there would have been 1.2 million fewer deaths from coronary heart disease in men in England and Wales over the past 50 years. Secular trends in mean per capita fat consumption show a similar pattern to secular trends in coronary heart disease mortality in men. Fat consumption is positively correlated with coronary heart disease mortality in men (r(s)=0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.86) and inversely associated with coronary heart disease mortality in women (-0.30; -0.49 to -0.08) over this time. Although sex ratios for mortality from coronary heart disease show a clear period effect, those for lung cancer show a cohort effect. Sex ratios for stroke mortality were constant and close to unity for the entire period. Geographical variations in the sex ratio for coronary heart disease were associated with mean per capita fat consumption (0.64; 0.44 to 0.78) but were not associated with the sex ratio for smoking. CONCLUSION: Sex differences are largely the result of environmental factors and hence not inevitable. Understanding the factors that determine sex differences has important implications for public health, particularly for countries and parts of countries where the death rates for coronary heart disease are currently increasing.
OBJECTIVE: To examine secular trends and geographical variations in sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease and investigate how these relate to distributions in risk factors. DESIGN: National and international data were used to examine secular trends and geographical variations in sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease and risk factors. SETTING: England and Wales, 1921-98; Australia, France, Japan, Sweden, and the United States, 1947-97; 50 countries, 1992-6. DATA SOURCES: Office for National Statistics, World Health Organization, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. RESULTS: The 20th century epidemic of coronary heart disease affected only men in most industrialised countries and had a very rapid onset in England and Wales, which has been examined in detail. If this male only epidemic had not occurred there would have been 1.2 million fewer deaths from coronary heart disease in men in England and Wales over the past 50 years. Secular trends in mean per capita fat consumption show a similar pattern to secular trends in coronary heart disease mortality in men. Fat consumption is positively correlated with coronary heart disease mortality in men (r(s)=0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.86) and inversely associated with coronary heart disease mortality in women (-0.30; -0.49 to -0.08) over this time. Although sex ratios for mortality from coronary heart disease show a clear period effect, those for lung cancer show a cohort effect. Sex ratios for stroke mortality were constant and close to unity for the entire period. Geographical variations in the sex ratio for coronary heart disease were associated with mean per capita fat consumption (0.64; 0.44 to 0.78) but were not associated with the sex ratio for smoking. CONCLUSION: Sex differences are largely the result of environmental factors and hence not inevitable. Understanding the factors that determine sex differences has important implications for public health, particularly for countries and parts of countries where the death rates for coronary heart disease are currently increasing.
Authors: K Kuulasmaa; H Tunstall-Pedoe; A Dobson; S Fortmann; S Sans; H Tolonen; A Evans; M Ferrario; J Tuomilehto Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-02-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Joseph G Grzywacz; Eleanor Palo Stoller; A Nichol Brewer-Lowry; Ronny A Bell; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2011-06-01
Authors: Klaas A Hartholt; Suzanne Polinder; Ed F van Beeck; Nathalie van der Velde; Esther M M van Lieshout; Peter Patka; Tischa J M van der Cammen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Debbie A Lawlor; Shah Ebrahim; Peter Whincup; Jonathan Sterne; Olia Papacosta; Goya Wannamethee; Surinder Dhanjil; Maura Griffin; Andrew N Nicolaides; George Davey Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.710