Literature DB >> 11545158

Effects of attention on pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: foveal field stimulation versus peripheral field stimulation.

M Hoshiyama1, R Kakigi.   

Abstract

The effects of foveal field attention on pattern reversal visual evoked potential (VEP) were investigated in thirteen normal subjects. Conventional monocular VEP was recorded during the three conditions of control, foveal concentration and reaction time task. Three patterns of checker-board, which were full field (radius, 0-9 degrees), peripheral field (2.5-9 degrees) and foveal field (0-2.5 degrees), were presented for the stimulation in each condition. The P100 and N145 amplitude of the peripheral field VEP were significantly smaller during the concentration and the reaction time task conditions that that in the control session, while the foveal field VEP amplitudes were enhanced in the concentration and reaction time tasks conditions. The full field VEP amplitudes were not significantly changed by the conditions. We concluded that the act of concentration to the foveal field or the task requiring attention to the foveal field, enhanced the VEP response to foveal field stimulation and suppressed the VEP to the peripheral field. A gating effect in area V1 was speculated, although extra-striate cortex might contribute.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11545158     DOI: 10.1023/a:1011132830123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  6 in total

1.  The effect of fixation instability on the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  Michael Menz; Erich Sutter; Momoyo Menz
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Influence of rotating shift work on visual reaction time and visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Hemamalini R V; Krishnamurthy N; Saravanan A
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-10-20

3.  The effect of acute sleep deprivation on visual evoked potentials in professional drivers.

Authors:  Melinda L Jackson; Rodney J Croft; Katherine Owens; Robert J Pierce; Gerard A Kennedy; David Crewther; Mark E Howard
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Visual mismatch negativity to vanishing parts of objects in younger and older adults.

Authors:  István Sulykos; Zsófia Anna Gaál; István Czigler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visual evoked potentials in subgroups of migraine with aura patients.

Authors:  Gianluca Coppola; Martina Bracaglia; Davide Di Lenola; Cherubino Di Lorenzo; Mariano Serrao; Vincenzo Parisi; Antonio Di Renzo; Francesco Martelli; Antonello Fadda; Jean Schoenen; Francesco Pierelli
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 7.277

6.  Early Visual Processing is Affected by Clinical Subtype in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Magnetoencephalography Study.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Mizuno; Tetsuya Tsuji; Yves Rossetti; Laure Pisella; Hisao Ohde; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.