Literature DB >> 11545135

Evaluation of the precision of magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping for blood flow measurements.

G P Chatzimavroudis1, J N Oshinski, R H Franch, P G Walker, A P Yoganathan, R I Pettigrew.   

Abstract

Evaluating the in vivo accuracy of magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping (PVM) is not straightforward because of the absence of a validated clinical flow quantification technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate PVM by investigating its precision, both in vitro and in vivo, in a 1.5 Tesla scanner. In the former case, steady and pulsatile flow experiments were conducted using an aortic model under a variety of flow conditions (steady: 0.1-5.5 L/min; pulsatile: 10-75 mL/cycle). In the latter case, PVM measurements were taken in the ascending aorta of ten subjects, seven of which had aortic regurgitation. Each velocity measurement was taken twice, with the slice perpendicular to the long axis of the aorta. Comparison between the measured and true flow rates and volumes confirmed the high accuracy of PVM in measuring flow in vitro (p > 0.85). The in vitro precision of PVM was found to be very high(steady: y = 1.00x + 0.02, r = 0.999; pulsatile: y = 0.98x + 0.72, r = 0.997; x: measurement #1, y: measurement #2) and this was confirmed by Bland-Altman analysis. Of great clinical significance was the high level of the in vivo precision (y = 1.01x - 0.04, r = 0.993), confirmed statistically (p = 1.00). In conclusion, PVM provides repeatable blood flow measurements. The high in vitro accuracy and precision, combined with the high in vivo precision, are key factors for the establishment of PVM as the "gold-standard" to quantify blood flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11545135     DOI: 10.1081/jcmr-100000142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  27 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of pulmonary hypertension by CT and MR imaging.

Authors:  Sebastian Ley; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; Christian Fink; Claus P Heussel; Mathias M Borst; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Quantitation of mitral regurgitation after percutaneous MitraClip repair: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian Hamilton-Craig; Wendy Strugnell; Niranjan Gaikwad; Matthew Ischenko; Vicki Speranza; Jonathan Chan; Johanne Neill; David Platts; Gregory M Scalia; Darryl J Burstow; Darren L Walters
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07

Review 3.  Aortic valvular imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: seeking for comprehensiveness.

Authors:  Gianluca De Rubeis; Nicola Galea; Isabella Ceravolo; Gian Marco Dacquino; Iacopo Carbone; Carlo Catalano; Marco Francone
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Triphasic mitral and tricuspid flows: a sign of diastolic dysfunction in a young patient with severely dilated atria and giant pulmonary veins.

Authors:  Marcelo Felipe Kozak; Majied Alariefy; Joel A Kirsh; Shi-Joon Yoo
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by MR: why, how and when.

Authors:  Ricardo Duarte; Gabriel Fernandez
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-06-15

6.  The quantification of pulmonary valve haemodynamics using MRI.

Authors:  Scott A Reid; Peter G Walker; John Fisher; Z Nagy; John P Ridgway; Kevin G Watterson; Mohan U Sivananthan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  MR imaging of aortic coarctation.

Authors:  F Secchi; A Iozzelli; G D E Papini; A Aliprandi; G Di Leo; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Coronary artery flow measurement using navigator echo gated phase contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Kevin Johnson; Puneet Sharma; John Oshinski
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Qualitative echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve regurgitation with quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance: a comparative study.

Authors:  Shelby Kutty; Kevin K Whitehead; Shobha Natarajan; Matthew A Harris; Gil Wernovsky; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions.

Authors:  Lau Brix; Steffen Ringgaard; Allan Rasmusson; Thomas Sangild Sørensen; W Yong Kim
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.